Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(63,958 posts)
Thu Mar 20, 2025, 12:21 PM Mar 20

The perversity of false arrest claims. Plaintiffs has evidence he was falsely arrested for being a journalist.

Raffi Melkonian
‪@rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social‬

Follow
The perversity of false arrest claims. Plaintiffs has evidence he was falsely arrested for being a journalist. The police then get to hypothesize some reason they *could* have arrested him legitimately, and win without trial if they can do that.

https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/24/24-10455.0.pdf
At the time of Rusanowsky’s arrest, the Code stated that “f a
sidewalk is not provided, a pedestrian walking along and on a highway shall if
possible walk on: (1) the left side of the roadway; or (2) the shoulder of the
highway facing oncoming traffic.”14 To do otherwise is a misdemeanor.1
ALT
March 20, 2025 at 10:48 AM

https://bsky.app/profile/rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social/post/3lkswxtyzac24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»The perversity of false a...