Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Acting Navy chief fired Crozier for 'panicking' -- and before Trump could intervene
Source: Washington Post
Acting Navy chief fired Crozier for panicking and before Trump could intervene
By David Ignatius
Columnist
April 5, 2020 at 5:43 p.m. EDT
Acting Navy secretary Thomas Modly, in an extensive interview about the firing of the commander of a disease-threatened aircraft carrier, said he acted because he believed the captain was panicking under pressure and wanted to make the move himself, before President Trump ordered the captains dismissal.
I didnt want to get into a decision where the president would feel that he had to intervene because the Navy couldnt be decisive, Modly told me in a telephone call from Hawaii at about 1 a.m. Sunday, Washington time. He continued: If I were president, and I saw a commanding officer of a ship exercising such poor judgment, I would be asking why the leadership of the Navy wasnt taking action itself."
Modly offered a lengthy account of his actions in the dismissal Thursday of Capt. Brett Crozier, the commanding officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt. The nuclear-power aircraft carrier with a crew of about 4,800 had been stricken by an outbreak of the novel coronavirus. On March 30, Crozier sent an emotional email pleading for help, which leaked the next day. Two days after that, Modly fired him generating criticism from former senior military officials, who expressed deep concern about the impact of the precipitous act on morale and on commanders willingness to speak out with unwelcome news.
Crozier, who walked alone down the gangplank of his giant ship to the cheers of his crew, is now infected with the virus from which he tried to shield his sailors.
The Roosevelt incident has the ingredients of a morality play at sea: A captain desperate to protect his sailors, who takes actions that his superiors view as a sign of faltering resolve and judgment. Navy leaders worry about protecting the ship, but also about shielding the Navy from an irascible, impulsive commander in chief.
-snip-
By David Ignatius
Columnist
April 5, 2020 at 5:43 p.m. EDT
Acting Navy secretary Thomas Modly, in an extensive interview about the firing of the commander of a disease-threatened aircraft carrier, said he acted because he believed the captain was panicking under pressure and wanted to make the move himself, before President Trump ordered the captains dismissal.
I didnt want to get into a decision where the president would feel that he had to intervene because the Navy couldnt be decisive, Modly told me in a telephone call from Hawaii at about 1 a.m. Sunday, Washington time. He continued: If I were president, and I saw a commanding officer of a ship exercising such poor judgment, I would be asking why the leadership of the Navy wasnt taking action itself."
Modly offered a lengthy account of his actions in the dismissal Thursday of Capt. Brett Crozier, the commanding officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt. The nuclear-power aircraft carrier with a crew of about 4,800 had been stricken by an outbreak of the novel coronavirus. On March 30, Crozier sent an emotional email pleading for help, which leaked the next day. Two days after that, Modly fired him generating criticism from former senior military officials, who expressed deep concern about the impact of the precipitous act on morale and on commanders willingness to speak out with unwelcome news.
Crozier, who walked alone down the gangplank of his giant ship to the cheers of his crew, is now infected with the virus from which he tried to shield his sailors.
The Roosevelt incident has the ingredients of a morality play at sea: A captain desperate to protect his sailors, who takes actions that his superiors view as a sign of faltering resolve and judgment. Navy leaders worry about protecting the ship, but also about shielding the Navy from an irascible, impulsive commander in chief.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/05/acting-navy-chief-fired-crozier-panicking-before-trump-might-intervene/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1788 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Acting Navy chief fired Crozier for 'panicking' -- and before Trump could intervene (Original Post)
Eugene
Apr 2020
OP
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. Still wondering about howcum no looking for the leaker?
Phoenix61
(17,627 posts)3. I've been thinking that same thing.
Wonder what e-mail system he used. Hell, they fired an IG for doing his job but they seem to have no interest in finding who leaked this e-mail. Any bets on it being the Mobly.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)2. Sounds Like He'd Fit Right In With Red China's Leadership, Sir
"What a nimrod! What a ultra-maroon!"
Pachamama
(17,013 posts)4. Capt Crozier is a hero and patriot and I am praying that he recovers from having COVID-19
I hope one day to see Trump, Modly, Espy and all the rest of the traitors and crooks all fired and charged for their crimes and failure to uphold the constitution and to protect our citizens and military - and Capt. Crozier elevated to the top level of our Navy.