A bit about NLAW weapon system for those who might be interested.
The Next Generation Light Anti-tank Weapon (NLAW), also known commercially as the Main Battle Tank and Light Anti-tank Weapon (MBT LAW),[2] is a Anglo-Swedish short-range fire-and-forget anti-tank missile system. Designed for use by infantry, the NLAW is shoulder fired and disposable, firing once before being disposed of. It is currently in use with the military forces of the United Kingdom, Finland, Luxembourg, Ukraine, and Sweden, among others.
The NLAW was developed by Saab Bofors Dynamics and Thales Air Defence in collaboration with the British Ministry of Defence in 2002. The development is a joint venture between the UK and Sweden using technology derived from the BILL 2 (warhead and guidance), and AT4 CS (confined space capability) systems. The UK MoD Defence Procurement Agency will procure the systems for both the UK and Sweden, with Sweden having signed a contract for the weapon in December 2005 when it was designated the "RB (Robot) 57".[3]
It has been estimated that the UK requirement may be for up to 20,000 systems for the British Armed Forces and each system has a shelf life of around 20 years. In December 2007, Finland placed an order for an undisclosed number of NLAW systems. An additional, undisclosed, number was ordered in December 2008.[3]
It is a soft-launch system, allowing it to be used by infantry from within an enclosed space. In this system, the missile is first launched out of the launcher using a low powered ignition. After the missile travels several metres into flight, its main rocket ignites, propelling the missile from there on to the target. Guidance is obtained using predicted line of sight (PLOS).[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_generation_Light_Anti-tank_Weapon
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)You never know when the Swedes are going to invade.
eppur_se_muova
(37,371 posts)relayerbob
(7,013 posts)Chainfire
(17,757 posts)I don't really disagree.
I would have thought that the absurdity of the statement, in the light of current events, would not have required the use of an emoji.
relayerbob
(7,013 posts)Glad it wasn't one of them