Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:47 PM Nov 2012

New women's professional soccer league announced, with eight U.S. teams

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/new-womens-professional-soccer-league-announced-with-eight-us-teams--180386671.html

"U.S. Soccer has announced a new women's league in the United States.

Eight cities or regions will be part of the league's start: Boston, Chicago, Kansas City, New Jersey, Portland, Seattle, western New York state and Washington, D.C.

The league is set to start in March or April next year.

The Canadian and Mexican soccer federations are on board for the league, looking to use the league to develop its talent.

..."


FYI... It's good to see teams in Seattle, Portland, and Kansas City. I'm not sure why they would put a team in Boston, however.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New women's professional soccer league announced, with eight U.S. teams (Original Post) HuckleB Nov 2012 OP
I don't know the answer Rabid_Rabbit Dec 2012 #1
They put one in Boston.. Upton Dec 2012 #2
They did put some teams in some strange places, as you note. HuckleB Dec 2012 #3
The Portland team will probably do very well. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #4
 

Rabid_Rabbit

(131 posts)
1. I don't know the answer
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 02:55 PM
Dec 2012

but I don't believe creating a league with 8 teams all across the US is the way to build a women's professional league. The travel costs alone will bankrupt this league in a year or two

Upton

(9,709 posts)
2. They put one in Boston..
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:11 AM
Dec 2012

because they had a franchise (Breakers) in the previous women's league, the WPS..The problem with all this is, the WPS lasted only a few years and averaged but 3500 a game in it's final season. The new league's long term viability is shaky at best..

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
3. They did put some teams in some strange places, as you note.
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 09:48 PM
Dec 2012

Time will tell if management has a feasible plan this time around. Washington and New Jersey also seem sketchy, but Chicago, KC, Portland and Seattle are towns they need to make it in if it is ever going to work.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
4. The Portland team will probably do very well.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 04:47 PM
Dec 2012

I'm excited, to say the least. The Thorns (love the name...) will play at Jeld-Wen Field, where Timbers home games are played. It's a nice facility (although already too small for the Timbers...every game sells out fast), and it's an easy walking distance from my house. I'm not sure how the process of divvying up the USWNT players who are interested in the league will work out, but if where they currently live is any factor, we could be sitting pretty. Abby Wambach and Megan Rapinoe both live here in Portland.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Soccer/Football»New women's professional ...