Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,645 posts)
Mon Nov 27, 2023, 10:24 PM Nov 2023

The lithium/carbon dioxide battery.

The paper to which I'll refer in this post is this one: Boosted Reaction Kinetics of Li–CO2 Batteries by Atomic Layer-Deposited Mo2N on Hydrogen Substituted Graphdiyne Junxiang Zhang, Guicai Qi, Jianli Cheng, Paula Ratajczak, Zhuanpei Wang, Francois Beguin, and Bin Wang ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2023 11 (45), 16185-16193.

My interest in this system does not at all contradict my frequent statement of the second law of thermodynamics in this form: "Storing energy wastes it."

Nevertheless, I do use batteries; my recently wrecked car was a hybrid car; I am looking to replace it; I own a battery powered lawnmower, and just purchased a battery powered snow blower. These batteries contain lithium, manganese, nickel and cobalt, the latter having a high moral cost, since cobalt is largely mined by modern day slaves.

Disturbed as I am by my moral hypocrisy, I do read a fair number of papers on batteries in my general reading, but this one really caught my eye because it's cobalt free, and because it reduces carbon dioxide to elemental carbon.

From the introduction:

Electric vehicles with longer driving mileage and unmanned aerial vehicles with prolonged cruise duration require urgently higher energy density of batteries. (1−4) Lithium–carbon dioxide (Li–CO2) battery, which demonstrates a high theoretical energy density of 1876 W h·kg–1 and a high discharge plateau (∼2.8 V vs Li+/Li), has attracted increasing attention as one of the promising next-generation metal-gas batteries. (5−7) Li–CO2 batteries can simultaneously realize the fixation of greenhouse gas CO2 and high energy density supply, which show enormous application potentiality in CO2-rich situations such as deep-sea work and Mars exploration (96% of its atmosphere on Mars is CO2). The main reaction process involved in aprotic Li–CO2 batteries is as follows: 4Li+ + 3CO2 + 4e- ↔ Li2CO3 + C. (8−10) However, the sluggish kinetics of the discharged product Li2CO3 with stable chemical stability during recharging have greatly restricted the rate performance and cycling stability of Li–CO2 batteries. Meanwhile, the arduous decomposition of insulating Li2CO3 during recharging also leads to high overpotential and consequent electrolyte degradation. (11−13) The continuous accumulation of undecomposed Li2CO3 on the cathode occupies the reaction sites and severely blocks the CO2 diffusion channels, further resulting in large polarization and poor cycling performance of the batteries. Therefore, efficient cathode catalysts are highly imperative to boost the decomposition of Li2CO3 and facile reaction kinetics.

In recent years, several kinds of cathode catalysts, including carbon materials, (14−20) noble metals, (10,12,21−26) transition metals and their compounds, (27−36) metal–organic frameworks, (37,38) and covalent organic frameworks, (39,40) have been developed and improved the electrochemical performance of Li–CO2 batteries. Among them, integrating an efficient metal catalyst into highly conductive carbon have shown significantly facilitated kinetics in Li–CO2batteries as well as other gas-involved catalytic reactions. (29,32,36) A variety of carbon/metal composite catalysts, such as ultrathin Ir nanosheets on N-doped carbon fibers, (21) RuO2 on carbon nanotubes (CNTs), (22) ultrafine Ru nanoparticles on activated carbon nanofibers, (23) ZnS quantum dots on N-doped reduced graphene oxide(GO), (27) adjacent Co single atom/GO, (35) Ru–Cu nanoparticles on graphene, (41) Mo2C/CNTs, (42) Ru–Co nanoparticles on carbon nanofibers, (43) etc., have been prepared and showed outstanding catalytic activity and remarkably reduced the voltage gap between CO2 reduction and evolution process. However, reported carbon/metal composite catalysts have several drawbacks: weak bonding strength between carbon and metal catalysts, uneven distribution of the nanoparticles, and limited catalyst utilization, leading to the formation of large aggregates and high loading but partly inefficient catalytic behavior. Moreover, the loading amount, crystal structure, and catalytic sites of metal catalysts are difficult to precisely regulate to further improve and optimize their catalytic activity.

The emerged graphdiyne (GDY) material is a novel allotrope of carbon (44) which contains both sp and sp2 hybridized carbon atoms in the carbon framework and possesses a large specific surface area, uniform pore structure, and excellent electrochemical stability. Different from traditional carbon materials like graphene and CNTs, it was suggested that the coexistence of sp and sp2 carbon atoms is favorable for chelating metal atoms and facilitating the charge transfer between metal atoms and GDY. (45) These merits make GDY an ideal substrate for anchoring metal catalysts with suppressed aggregation. So, GDY/metal composite catalysts such as GDY-WS2 (46) and MoS2/N-GDY (47) have shown efficient catalytic activity in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). In addition, single metal atoms can be stably anchored and evenly dispersed on GDY, such as Ni(Fe)/GDY, (48) Pd/GDY, (49) and Mo/GDY, (50) with highly efficient catalytic activity to the HER and the nitrogen reduction reaction. At the same time, GDY can be synthesized through a copper-catalyzed C–C cross-coupling reaction, which makes it possible to precisely adjust its morphology and chemical properties, including conductivity, pore structure, and affinity for metal atoms, thereby conveniently optimizing the catalytic activity of the GDY/metal catalyst...


The authors show how to address some of the kinetic drawbacks of these batteries by the plasma assisted atomic layer deposition of a molybdenum nitride catalyst.

This hardly ready for prime time, and it will certainly do nothing to make so called "renewable energy" a significant viable and sustainable form of energy, which it has not been, is not now, and never will be, batteries or no batteries.

Nevertheless a system that reduces carbon dioxide to elemental carbon should always be of interest.

In this sense it's a cool paper.

Earlier I wrote about such a system (which I view as a tool to make carbon based materials and electrodes for the FFC and Hall-Heroult reduction of ores to metals) here: Electrolysis of Lithium-Free Molten Carbonates

I see a lot of potential in this molten carbonate system, assuming it isn't lost in the shuffle.

Have a nice day tomorrow.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The lithium/carbon dioxid...