Ignorance Squad Strikes Again: US Cancels Nature Springer Journal Subscriptions

[NNadir]

These are very important journals for scientists.

Trump cuts subscriptions to Springer Nature journals

The Trump administration has ended several U.S. science agencies’ subscriptions to Springer Nature journals, including the prestigious Nature titles. The move, which will end easy access to the journals for agency staff scientists, follows recent criticisms of academic journals by administration officials who accused them of bias.

The cuts involving the for-profit, publicly traded Springer Nature—one of the world’s largest scientific publishers, producing more than 3000 journal titles—were first reported Wednesday by Axios, without detailing specific agencies affected. Government officials have given conflicting statements about whether the cut included the company’s single biggest U.S. government subscription contract, with the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Yesterday, Inside Higher Ed reported that NIH first said its Springer Nature subscriptions had not been canceled, but later the agency’s parent department, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), told the outlet they had; today, HHS provided the same statement to Science, saying “all contracts … are terminated or no longer active.” (The White House press office did not respond to Science’s request for comment.) A Science review of the USASpending.gov database shows that earlier this month the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Department of Energy canceled Springer Nature subscriptions for which they had committed $3 million in funding this year.

The database shows that at least seven agencies had subscription contracts this year with Springer Nature as of 17 June, for which they had planned to eventually spend up to $25 million. Of that, about half was for NIH, which does not currently appear as canceled—but the database can be up to 2 weeks out of date, and its data are considered incomplete. The National Science Foundation’s subscription doesn’t appear in the database. But a spokesperson said today the agency continues to have a subscription.

In a statement, Springer Nature said, “We don’t comment on individual contracts, but across our U.S. business there is no material change to our customers or their spend, and we remain confident about the strength of the service we provide.”

The cancellations were not the first of their kind by President Donald Trump’s administration. In March, USDA told staff members it had canceled subscriptions carried by its National Agricultural Library to save on costs. The move covered nearly 400 of the library’s roughly 2000 journals, published by 15 organizations, most of them nonprofit—but no Springer Nature titles.

Meanwhile administration officials have criticized journals for their editorial policies. In April, the former interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, wrote journal editors asking them about concerns that “more and more journals … are conceding they are partisans in various scientific debates...”In a statement, Springer Nature said, “We don’t comment on individual contracts, but across our U.S. business there is no material change to our customers or their spend, and we remain confident about the strength of the service we provide...”

Apparently the illiterates in this administration of ignorant thugs thinks they are in a position to judge the value of science, although there isn't one, not one, who could pass a freshman science course.

[erronis]

1. If welcoming science and the scientific method is "biased", then yes - we plead guilty.

If wilful ignorance or incipient stupidity is a hallmark of this administration, then they are guilty.

[lostincalifornia]

2. Nature is one of the most reputable scientific publications out there. This is a disgrace, but entirely

predictable.

[dedl67]

3. It is indispensable for a scientist to be able to have quick access to scientific publications

One of the blessings of the internet is that one can go to websites of journals, or Google Scholar, etc., and quickly download relevant publications, rather requesting reprints from the authors by mail or going to the stacks in the library - if it even carried the journal - as I once had to do. The Trump administration is starting to crush the ability for government scientists to access vital knowledge. This will probably extend to other journals.

[SorellaLaBefana]

4. "Nature" and "Science" are the two premier general science journals in the world

Science" is the not-for-profit journal of AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science)

https://www.science.org/journal/science

"Nature"—now owned by Springer—is most definitely for-profit. However it continues to maintain the high standards it has been know for

https://www.nature.com

I subscribe to both

Springer Publishing itself is more than a bit annoying. Seems like every two weeks they launch a new (for profit) journal.