TomDaisy
(2,120 posts)BootinUp
(49,020 posts)Didnt change much at all.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)I miss both of the men like they were family.
Blue Owl
(54,706 posts)progressoid
(50,738 posts)talking about this UFO "whistleblower"
Must be a slow news day at Fox.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,719 posts)has planets (My Son The Astronomer does exo-planet research), it's important to realize that the conditions that actually lead to life of any kind are probably very rare.
First off, some 70% of stars are red dwarfs, so if life evolves on planets around a red dwarf, it's probably going to be very different from our life. Only about 7-8% of the stars in our galaxy are like the sun.
There's also a Goldilocks zone for stars, just as there's a Goldilocks zone for planets. Get close to the center of the galaxy and stars are so close together that radiation is a huge problem, and would probably prevent life at all. Too far out may likewise not be so good either.
It also may well be that having a relatively large moon, as we do, is absolutely crucial. It gives us the tides, which probably had a positive influence on life.