DU Community Help
Related: About this forumUnable to complete Jury Duty
Hi all,
I just got asked to serve on a jury about a post.
Unfortunately, by the time I got to the actual post, there had been so much back and forth in the posts above, it was impossible to see the post in question!
(The stacking had pushed it off the edge, and even fully scrolled to the right, all I saw was a sliver of the red color of the post.)
The only thing I could do was cancel out of jury service, which I hated to do!
Am I going to get any sort of penalty for doing this?
And if so, who would I contact about that?
Thanks!
Ferrets are Cool
(21,957 posts)at least for me it is. Makes it easy.
Oops, I didn't read all your post. My bad.
TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)There are about 500 responses in the thread. In jury service, they're tiled so that each one is slightly to the right of the above it. The post in question was down far enough that it scrolled off the page and no text was visible.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,957 posts)TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)I've been on juries for a long, long time and had never seen one scroll entirely off the page. Usually, one can do a search and figure out which post it was, but that wasn't working, either. First time for everything!
Bev54
(11,917 posts)that we were supposed to make the decision on.
TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)There's no penalty for canceling jury service. In this instance, like you, I didn't see any other alternative.
Bev54
(11,917 posts)I suspect they will look into it when everyone does the same.
Marie Marie
(10,003 posts)I canceled out too.
femmedem
(8,444 posts)sweetloukillbot
(12,597 posts)The post was in red, but it was less than a half-inch wide and would not display.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,893 posts)Wrote a note about it under Ask the Administrators, but Im not sure that was the best place to do that.
niyad
(119,833 posts)getagrip_already
(17,425 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,783 posts)It was impossible to read the post that was to be evaluated. Dont know if the thread was really that long or if there was some kind of glitch.
gibraltar72
(7,629 posts)it just kept going further to right until it left the screen. I backed up and opted out. Never had that happen before.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)nobody can read the jury thread.
From the way it was going, looks like no point voting to hide it anyway.
samnsara
(18,282 posts)..Im not going to ruin someones day with just a guess.
kimmylavin
(2,291 posts)First time that happened to me!
Just didn't want to be in jury duty jail or anything.
plcdude
(5,321 posts)It seemed bogus to me so I canceled out also too many posts and could not find the one in question
bullimiami
(13,988 posts)paleotn
(19,167 posts)When it gets that far out of hand, just delete the whole damn thing. Ugh.
Bradshaw3
(7,962 posts)Like others, I tried several times to read the reported post and couldn't. Then I went and read the OP and it was ridiculous what was going on. The whole thread should have been deleted. Just tit for tat. One of the posters I had on ignore for doing the same thing before.
PJMcK
(22,868 posts)I've never turned down Jury Service before.
It was a weird graphic problem.
Oh, well. The thread seemed pretty aggressive anyway.
plcdude
(5,321 posts)It seemed bogus to me so I canceled out also too many posts and could not find the one in question
Unable to view the reported post.
gademocrat7
(11,163 posts)likesmountains 52
(4,175 posts)dlk
(12,348 posts)melm00se
(5,053 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)going on, so I canceled.
For one reason, I seldom block posts unless the alerted post threaten someone or is a vile message. Just about anything else can be handled by rebuffing or rebutting the original poster if one doesn't agree with it.
Similarly, I seldom block posts that someone alerts saying the post is "pushing right wing talking points." Just because one says they don't support say mandatory Medicare-for-All, it is not a "right wing talking point." That "right wing talking point" is overused here and is usually just someone who doesn't like someone's opinion. We should welcome most opinions even if we strongly disagree. As above, if you don't agree with them, say so in a rebuttal post.
Another thing, it used to be that one could go back to the original thread before voting so that a jury member can determine the entire context of the alerted post. Since we can no longer do that, I seldom vote to block a post. As above, if you don't agree with the post, say so. Also, under the old system, you could actually write a comment about why you decided to hide or allow. And the alerted poster got to see those (but not the juror's name). I really liked that.
I'm a little more strict on thread titles because a lot of people just read those and not the thread. Thread titles should be accurate and fair.
In any event, you don't get disciplined for canceling out of a jury.
Oh, I have only alerted on one post in 15 some years here. It was one of mine that I thought better of later.
northoftheborder
(7,608 posts)progree
(11,463 posts)I let someone else decide in my place, someone who might know the background and context of the issue more than I do.
Tarc
(10,575 posts)I was able to copy it all an dump it into Word, to see what the post actually was at least. But no way to get over to click the actual buttons.
EarlG
(22,538 posts)We are looking into it.
kimmylavin
(2,291 posts)Knew you guys would be on it; was just trying to figure out how to get you!
Roland99
(53,345 posts)niyad
(119,833 posts)sheshe2
(87,415 posts)Me as well.
OilemFirchen
(7,159 posts)Something tells me it's all the same thread.