DU Community Help
Related: About this forumWhat are DU rules if hypothetically someone wins a primary that is too extreme?
DU rules state to support Democrats and never bash them, but what if someone extreme wins a Democratic primary somewhere? What is and isn't allowed? Do the same rules still apply? Are they loosened a little? Or should we just not talk about him or her if we have nothing nice to say?
rpannier
(24,571 posts)You can disagree with them on policy ACA or Single payer for example. But to question their motives w/o facts to back them up is a no no
JudyM
(29,517 posts)Do not post disrespectful nicknames, insults, or highly inflammatory attacks against any Democratic public figures. Do not post anything that could be construed as bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for any Democratic general election candidate, and do not compare any Democratic general election candidate unfavorably to their general election opponent(s).
Why we have this rule: Our forum members support and admire a wide variety of Democratic politicians and public figures. Constructive criticism is always welcome, but our members don't expect to see Democrats viciously denigrated on this website. This rule also applies to Independents who align themselves with Democrats (eg: Bernie Sanders).
Polybius
(17,793 posts)If hypothetically Cynthia McKinney (extreme left, 9/11 Truther) ran for Congress again, they still apply 100%?
JudyM
(29,517 posts)bashing her, especially since the rule extends to independents. Itd ultimately be for a jury to decide.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,214 posts)since it seemed so widespread and I never saw any of the posts removed, but this would seem to indicate that it's not. Am I reading this right?
CentralMass
(15,536 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)For other candidates as well.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,214 posts)luv2fly
(2,479 posts)Just saying what I see.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,214 posts)while Bernie is working for them.
I worked hard to get Sinema elected, as did many others; and, to a person, everyone I know who voted for her feels betrayed.
hlthe2b
(106,318 posts)Trump and his ilk. If this OP is referring to the candidate I think, then EarlG may have to clarify in the near future. Because that candidate is very likely to be the opposite if they end up elected to Congress. Somehow I doubt the intent was ever to require vocal support of someone overtly trying to sabotage the party and its objectives thereby allowing our RW opponents to prevail--in the name of some long-term aim to promote a third party.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Tulsi Gabbard comes to mind, as well.
msongs
(70,169 posts)RainCaster
(11,542 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Say nothing.
On an employee Facebook page I ran during my time working I would often criticize my employer by simply not saying anything about what they were doing, but would often mention progressive policies or innovative ideas that competitors or others in the business sector were adopting. All posted without comment. People can and will draw their own conclusions, I just provided the additional information when I came across it.
mopinko
(71,789 posts)no bashing dems except the ones i, the juror, dont like either.
in which case, i will vote to let it stand.
as long as it's factual, and you dont get into personal attacks, you'll likely be fine.
bashing =/= telling the truth.