Gun rights vs women’s rights
Take, for example, the Florida legislators who passed the Firearms Owners Privacy Act. This Act prohibits physicians from inquiring about patients gun use and / or ownership. Medical associations opposing the bill called it physician gag law. When it comes to guns, Florida lawmakers found that protecting a patients privacy trumps both the physicians judgment and First Amendment rights.
When the patients are pregnant women, however, the same legislators have taken the inverse position on privacy rights. The same legislature passed a bill compelling physicians to recite a speech designed to discourage a woman from exercising her constitutionally protected right, while subjecting their patient, who has made the difficult decision to terminate her pregnancy, to a medically unnecessary sonogram. In other words, lawmakers believed gun owners have constitutional rights worthy of protection, but pregnant women do not.
Although in both cases legislators disregarded the physicians First Amendment rights, only in the case challenging the prohibition on gun inquiry did a federal appeals court find a violation of the First Amendment. Apparently oblivious to the benefits of a physicians discussion about gun safety with a patient, Florida is appealing the courts ruling. Ironically, in the challenge to a Texas sonogram law similar to Floridas, the federal court failed to find that the compelled speech violated the constitution. Judge Edith Jones agreed that the legislators could lawfully protect women from the potential devastating psychological consequences of later discovering that her decision was not fully informed.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/opinion/gun-rights-vs-womens-rights/15889/
This is the right-wing gun lobby on steroids. They place more importance on the right to buy a gun to use in a stand-your-ground act of vigilantism than they do in recognizing a woman's right to control her own body.
There is something fundamentally fucked up about this "good ole boy" right-wing gun culture mindset, and Trump is trying to legitimize it: guns are wonderful, but women are lesser beings.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)billh58
(6,655 posts)"progressive" agree with the right-wing on several issues, especially the gun humpers.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)gun owner. Gun lobbyists by their job description are obviously taking the view that gun ownership, and the right of personal carry explicit in the Heller v DC decision, trumps all other Constitutional rights. Does this absolutist position represent a majority of gun owners, and more importantly, is this position representative of the majority of US citizens?
billh58
(6,655 posts)http://www.gallup.com/poll/21496/Gun-Ownership-Higher-Among-Republicans-Than-Democrats.aspx
I believe the above at least partially answers your question. I also believe that your question: "is this the position of the majority of US Citizens" assumes that US Citizens are equal in most other respects, including politically. Generally speaking, the country appears to be split 50/50 Republican/Democratic, but gun ownership is more skewed towards the right-wing.
My answer is that in-your-face gun ownership (as represented by the right-wing gun lobby) is mainly a Republican, white, Tea-Party trait.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)that means these GOP voters represent only 16.5% of the population.
Add to that the 32% of Democrats, also approximately 30% of the population, the combined total is 26.1% of the population. A distinct minority that is attempting to frame gun possession as the norm.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.