"National Gun Fever Shows No Sign Of Breaking"
National Gun Fever Shows No Sign Of Breakingby Cynthia Tucker at the National Memo
http://www.nationalmemo.com/?author_name=cynthiatucker
"SNIP..............................................
Democrats have cowered before the gun lobby; the National Rifle Association has grown even more extreme; the U.S. Supreme Court has moved much further to the right. And, in the 20 years since Congress banned assault-type weapons and high-capacity magazines, Americans have heard a steady drumbeat of pro-firearms rhetoric that fetishizes the Second Amendment. In other words, the climate around firearms has gotten crazier.
Even before the current debate over more restrictive gun laws began, most political observers knew it would be difficult to get Congress to stand up to the firearms lobby. So its no great surprise that Majority Leader Harry Reid, who runs from the shadow of the National Rifle Association, slammed the door on Sen. Dianne Feinsteins effort to re-up the assault-weapons ban.
Still, I find myself once again wondering just how bad things have to get before the fever breaks before the country comes to its senses on firearms. Were in the throes of a kind of madness, a mass delusion that assigns to firearms the significance of religious totems.
Many critics of an assault-weapons ban note that it would not provide any magical cure-all for the mass shootings that have plagued us over the years since Columbine. Thats certainly true. But banning at least some assault-type weapons and the high-capacity magazines that feed them would be a step in the right direction. Why cant we take that step?
...............................................SNIP"
socialindependocrat
(1,372 posts)It's a step in the right direction.
If you got to the point where 95% of society was healthy
you would still need to find a way to stop that last 5%
from stuffing their faces...
It's a tough problem but that last 5% are the problem.
Dawson Leery
(19,582 posts)applegrove
(133,103 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)With people so skillfully traduced into fetishizing guns, they don't even question their programming anymore...
coldmountain
(802 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)But yes -- part and parcel, for each!
GoldenEagle16
(40 posts)because it does not take a single assault weapon out of circulation.
The logic is simple: X number of guns produces Y number of mass shootings. It is good that X is not getting larger but it is unacceptable that X is not getting smaller.
The AWB has to be the first step towards a real ban. A buy back or confiscation - I don't care.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.