Asking for some feedback

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

I was rereading the "Fatal Gaps" report from the MAIG folks and I inferred that some states, which seem to seriously under report mental health issues to the FBI data base, may be failing to make those reports due to privacy issues.

The database used in the NICS currently includes information as to why a purchaser may be declined permission to buy a firearm and enough identifying info to accurately distinguish one 'John Smith' from all the others.

Would it be a problem to set up an FBI managed database for NICS purposes which contains only the identifying info for prohibited buyers and a pointers to whatever state agency has made that determination? This way the nature of the issue remains private but the prohibited person's record does make it to the database.

Any thoughts?

[billh58]

1. Slumming, are we? n/t

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

2. rhetorical I assume

thanks for the thoughtful response

[billh58]

3. Any time gunner. n/t

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

4. Just to be clear...

...what qualifies one as a "gunner"?

[billh58]

5. When you're finished disrupting this

Group, you can go look in a mirror Bubba.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

6. Another contribution which is...

...about as welcome as a fart in airlock.

[billh58]

7. We both know what your motives are

in posting in this Group, so you don't really expect any courtesy or "contributions," do you gunner? Now go on back to the Gungeon and brag to your NRA apologist buddies how you really told those "grabbers" a thing or two.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

8. You don't seem to know me very well

Hope you day improves.

[billh58]

9. On the contrary, your posts

on DU offer much insight into your gunner mentality. My day is going just fine Bubba, but thanks for the thought.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

10. Apparently...

...more you than me.