Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(221,887 posts)
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 09:35 PM Sunday

Jack Smith's Options for Keeping Trump's Prosecutions Alive for Future Prosecutors - Glenn Kirschner



With the reporting that Special Counsel Jack Smith is "winding down" his two federal prosecutions of Donald Trump, the question becomes: can Jack Smith preserve the cases to be prosecuted once Trump leaves office?

Newsweek just reported, "Jack Smith May be able to 'Revive' Donald Trump Cases" according to legal analyst Barbara McQuade.

This video discusses the three main options for Jack Smith in deciding what to do with Trump's two pending federal criminal cases. - Glenn Kirschner - 11/17/2024.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ancianita

(38,478 posts)
2. I wish I could have his optimism. But whatever Jack Smith does, he needs to take his family and leave this country
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 09:47 PM
Sunday

by the end of December, if not sooner. Go back to the Hague. From there he could prosecute Trump, who could join Putin as an international criminal, and our intelligence agencies will help him.

Thanks!

Rhiannon12866

(221,887 posts)
3. Same here. As we discussed back in the day, TFG should have been prohibited from running for ANY public office
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 10:17 PM
Sunday

According to the Constitution, Amendment 14, Section 3, because he was an insurrectionist. And he wasn't just a participant, he intentionally incited it. And that should count against any of his Congressional co-conspirators as well - but when was the investigation?? Back in the day we also heard that there was going to be an investigation into those members of Congress who gave "Capitol Tours" just prior to January 6th (even though the Capitol was closed to tourist visits due to the pandemic), but those investigations/prosecutions never materialized, either. If only these prosecutions had taken place in a timely manner, we wouldn't be where we are now.

ancianita

(38,478 posts)
4. I hear you. Unfortunately, the explosion of crime outpaced the personnel appointment and funding delays.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 10:23 PM
Sunday

When Republicans are the minority they've always tried to squeeze federal law enforcement and just do investigative nothingburger drama in Congress.

Everything Biden's cabinet did it had to wait to do. He and the WH hit the ground running, but not the rest of his branch until nominees were confirmed, which for the DOJ took almost a year.

There's substantial evidence which might/might not rise to the level that qualifies for indictment, and then there's preponderance of evidence that goes beyond reasonable doubt. And then there's always the due process beyond "sufficient" level that can delay court cases before and during trials as they go up the appeal ladder, no matter how preponderant the evidence is.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Jack Smith's Options for ...