Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(249,605 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 12:00 AM Dec 20

Epstein Survivor Says DOJ's Partial Files Release Is "Not Sufficient" - Liberal Lens



Epstein survivor Sharlene Rochard says the Justice Department’s partial release of Epstein files is “not sufficient,” warning that delays and heavy redactions undermine transparency and retraumatize survivors.

In this interview, Rochard and a survivors’ attorney explain why victims cannot safely release names themselves, what meaningful disclosure would actually look like, and why full compliance with the law matters for accountability and trust in the justice system. - 12/19/2025.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Epstein Survivor Says DOJ's Partial Files Release Is "Not Sufficient" - Liberal Lens (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Dec 20 OP
He'll, no it's not sufficient. Missing massive info and what presented is redacted excessively Deuxcents Dec 20 #1
And the interest and pressure that they've been getting, especially from the survivors, should have told them that Rhiannon12866 Dec 20 #2

Deuxcents

(25,408 posts)
1. He'll, no it's not sufficient. Missing massive info and what presented is redacted excessively
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 01:06 AM
Dec 20

And should be considered obstruction of the demanded and lawful court order. If they think this will be good enough to satisfy the survivors and the public, they have misread the pulse of the people..We the People and we’re not going away. At all.

Rhiannon12866

(249,605 posts)
2. And the interest and pressure that they've been getting, especially from the survivors, should have told them that
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 01:19 AM
Dec 20

The law says that the release of the files had to be complete on the 19th, so how did they expect to get away with what little they released, especially files already in public domain? DOJ is already in hot water enough, how far are they willing to go to protect the felon-in-chief??

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Epstein Survivor Says DOJ...