Returning to my new tool in my quiver. This time regarding Gaza and how likely a resort would succeed.

[usaf-vet]

A U.S. takeover of Gaza to build a Mediterranean resort would be highly unlikely to succeed without massive resistance and deep-seated generational tensions. Here’s why:

1. Geopolitical and Legal Barriers

International Law & Sovereignty: Any attempt by the U.S. to seize Gaza for economic development would be an outright violation of international law and sovereignty. The international community, including allies, would strongly oppose such an action.
United Nations & Global Reaction: The UN would almost certainly condemn any U.S. intervention of this kind, and it could lead to severe diplomatic consequences.
Existing Conflict & Governance: Gaza is governed by Hamas, a militant group that is in direct conflict with Israel. Any attempt to forcibly develop the region would require military occupation, escalating violence further.

2. Local & Regional Backlash

Palestinian Resistance: Even if the plan promised economic prosperity, the people of Gaza—many of whom have suffered under war, blockades, and displacement—would see such a move as another form of colonization. The idea of a foreign power taking over their land for commercial purposes would likely spark generational resistance and militant opposition.
Arab & Muslim World Response: The entire Arab world, including U.S. allies like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, would likely condemn such a move, possibly leading to severe diplomatic and economic repercussions.
Israeli Stance: Even Israel, which has its own complex relationship with Gaza, might not support a direct U.S. takeover because it could create further instability and unwanted American entanglement in the region.

3. Historical Precedents & Colonial Echoes

Colonial & Imperialist Legacy: The idea of taking over a region for economic development mirrors historical European colonialism in the Middle East and Africa. These past experiences have left deep scars, making any similar U.S. action deeply unpopular and widely resisted across generations.
Failed Attempts at Western-Led Nation Building: The U.S. has a poor track record when it comes to reshaping foreign territories for economic or strategic purposes (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan). Any attempt to impose such a vision on Gaza would likely face the same fate—prolonged insurgency and failure.

4. Economic Viability & Practicality

Destruction & Infrastructure Issues: Gaza has been heavily bombed and lacks basic infrastructure. Turning it into a luxury resort would require massive investments, all while navigating war-torn conditions.
Security Concerns: No tourist would visit a "resort" in a place with ongoing conflict, instability, and potential terror threats. The idea of a peaceful Mediterranean getaway in an occupied war zone is not realistic.
Alternative Locations: The Mediterranean already has thriving resort locations in places like Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, and Israel’s own coastal cities. There would be little incentive to invest in a high-risk area.

Final Verdict

A U.S. takeover of Gaza to build a Mediterranean resort would be an absolute non-starter. The move would:

Face overwhelming local and regional resistance
Be condemned by the international community
Create generational resentment that would likely spark endless conflict
Be economically and logistically unfeasible

The only way economic development in Gaza could happen is through peaceful negotiations, local governance stability, and regional cooperation, not foreign occupation.

From a source more in formed the me

[Bernardo de La Paz]

1. Who would have to build it anyway? Palestinians. The whole concept is ridiculous

Palestinians are widely employed throughout the Middle East for construction.

Saudi citizens won't be constructing it.
Israeli citizens won't be constructing it.
US citizens won't be constructing it.

[HoosierDebbie]

2. These all make perfect sense.

All points are well thought out concerning why such a plan would not work. Unfortunately tfg doesn't think anything out, causing dire consequences for nearly everyone.

His probable reasons for proceeding

Because he said so.
Because he thinks he could make lots of money.
Because he wants to.

[usaf-vet]

3. He wants to expand HIS empire...... PERIOD! Hence, Canada, Greenland, Panama, and, yes, Gaza. If you have children of...

..... DRAFT age, you had better oppose the lunatic in the WH. Experts agree that none of these expansions could happen without a more significant military force, especially in Gaza and Panama. Canada will resist and win by political means. Greenland is more detailed, and it would drag European countries into the fray. If he attempted to use military force, I guess that NATO would be involved.

That needs more research on my part.

[Brother Buzz]

4. The pesky new and improved 'Monkey Wrench Gang' would be ready from day one

You just know the marmalade shartcannon has a 3D model of the Gaza Strip in the Map Room with has his damn flag planted on the choicest piece of real estate.

Socialize the cost and privatize the profit, Baby!