Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,452 posts)
9. James Hansen et al, Global warming in the pipeline
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 01:20 PM
Nov 2024
Oxford Open Climate Change, 2023, 3(1), kgad008
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008
Perspective article

Global warming in the pipeline



Abstract
Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields Charney (fast-feedback) equilibrium climate sensitivity 1.2 ± 0.3°C (2r) per W/m², which is 4.8°C ± 1.2°C for doubled CO₂. Consistent analysis of temperature over the full Cenozoic era—including ‘slow’ feedbacks by ice sheets and trace gases—supports this sensitivity and implies that CO₂ was 300–350 ppm in the Pliocene and about 450 ppm at transition to a nearly ice-free planet, exposing unrealistic lethargy of ice sheet models. Equilibrium global warming for today’s GHG amount is 10°C, which is reduced to 8°C by today’s human-made aerosols. Equilibrium warming is not ‘committed’ warming; rapid phaseout of GHG emissions would prevent most equilibrium warming from occurring. However, decline of aerosol emissions since 2010 should increase the 1970–2010 global warming rate of 0.18°C per decade to a post-2010 rate of at least 0.27°C per decade. Thus, under the present geopolitical approach to GHG emissions, global warming will exceed 1.5°C in the 2020s and 2°C before 2050. Impacts on people and nature will accelerate as global warming increases hydrologic (weather) extremes. The enormity of consequences demands a return to Holocene-level global temperature. Required actions include: (1) a global increasing price on GHG emissions accompanied by development of abundant, affordable, dispatchable clean energy, (2) East-West cooperation in a way that accommodates developing world needs, and (3) intervention with Earth’s radiation imbalance to phase down today’s massive human-made ‘geo-transformation’ of Earth’s climate. Current political crises present an opportunity for reset, especially if young people can grasp their situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Have we really let it get this bad? [View all] Think. Again. Nov 2024 OP
'What do you mean "we," white man?' (Tonto) Jit423 Nov 2024 #1
Point taken. And Thank You. Think. Again. Nov 2024 #2
Sorry Tonto OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #3
Came here to say that. Towlie Nov 2024 #10
Yes. We could have. We failed to. OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #4
I stopped reading at "neoliberal globalism" Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #5
Let's check the Encyclopedia... OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #6
I know what it means, and I know how the author is trying to use it Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #7
James Hansen et al, Global warming in the pipeline OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #9
Pretty big gap between "opportunity for reset" and "societal collapse" Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #11
Hmmm... in what way? OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #12
I thought he was saying "political reset"... Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #14
Let's say you read him right OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #15
Right now my primary concern is surviving Donnie... Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #17
Sadly, W. and Obama didn't do a lot for the climate OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #19
At least Obama didn't actively make things worse Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #20
Because, you know, Trump will be a godsend to the Palestinians. OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #22
6th Great Extinction is already underway... FirstLight Nov 2024 #8
I'm afraid the odds don't look good for humanity. OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #13
Recommended. H2O Man Nov 2024 #18
Fascism is the wealthy elite's way of preserving power in the face of civil unrest DSandra Nov 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Have we really let it get...»Reply #9