Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: According to one laid off federal employee, [View all]kelly1mm
(5,617 posts)34. The states, except in the limited capacity of employers of state employees do not 'pay' taxes the the feds. Payments
of income/FICA tax withholdings are paid by employers directly to the feds. Sacramento or Albany have no way to intercept those payments.
Further, any attempt to do so would be enjoined within minutes by the federal courts due to the Supremacy Clause.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e602/9e602d96cb69ecdec989c2fb75b09b6f1575acc5" alt=""
They just make a general accusation after spending a generation getting people to hate the government
Walleye
Wednesday
#9
Well, not any factual ones, but they have their made-up "examples" that the MAGAts will eat up
JHB
Wednesday
#39
That's really their only hope. Individual lawsuits are very expensive for ordinary folks ...
Hekate
Wednesday
#27
They can (and should) still file for UE. The .gov can chose to challenge the application for UE based on the firing
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#3
The states, except in the limited capacity of employers of state employees do not 'pay' taxes the the feds. Payments
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#34
So explain to me how say, California would intercept payments going from it's residents employers to the feds
kelly1mm
Wednesday
#50
I'm finding no evidence of any state denying unemployment benefits to someone who was terminated
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#4
The fired federal employee on CNN had not filed for unemployment yet, but she thought it would make it more difficult.
surfered
Wednesday
#15
What state is that? I'm not doubting you but I've looked thoroughly online across almost all
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#18
Interesting. According to their website, you should be eligible for benefits unless you're fired for misconduct.
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#25
I'm absolutely sure Trump & Musk are counting on most workers not to fight back
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#41
What do you think "failure to perform your work adequately if you are capable of doing so"
nilram
Wednesday
#44
I'm willing to bet it will come out in the many, many wrongful termination lawsuits this will spawn
meadowlander
Wednesday
#5
No. Not the same as what TSF/M are doing. They are purging fed gov like they purged the gop. It's not for
wiggs
Wednesday
#52
Federal Civil Service has a process of mitigation by the employee of the reason for poor performance
surfered
Wednesday
#16
this isn't about saving money that will then be skimmed...although they will certainly get a taste somewhere. It's
wiggs
Wednesday
#53
I hope they can sue Musk personally, or whoever claimed the authority to fire them
William Seger
Wednesday
#30