Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Goldberg Holds All The Aces... [View all]live love laugh
(15,121 posts)34. Their denials are based on semantics alone. Maybe they named the discussion something else....
The point is the content of the discussion, the audience and the unsecured communication channels.
Of course Republican owned media will just repeat that no war plans were discussed.
IF the media actually says this (which I highly doubt) then they will say that they cant discuss national security issues publicly.
But the follow-up should be: you already did discuss national security issues publicly. WHY??
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I'm Astounded That Goldberg Is Not Tesifying At The Intelligence Hearing Today
MayReasonRule
Mar 25
#2
The DNI just testified that the information in the signal chain was not classified!!!
surfered
Mar 25
#15
NAL... However My Understanding Is That The Speech Clause Within The Chamber Proscribes This
MayReasonRule
Mar 25
#22
Heh, end of hearing. It looked like a barbecue!!!! But the meat gave off a rotten smell
RoeVWade
Mar 25
#23
This is just like another hundred things. A bunch of hoopla and not a damn thing will
doc03
Mar 25
#27
My Father And Mother Were Both A Part Of The Army Security Agency Back In The 50's.
MayReasonRule
Mar 25
#33
Their denials are based on semantics alone. Maybe they named the discussion something else....
live love laugh
Mar 25
#34
Why is no one talking about the fact that what ALL of these chucklenutz did is ILLEGAL AF?!?
OMGWTF
Mar 25
#39
They're Claiming This Is S.O.P. And No Classified Info Was Communicated Via Signal
MayReasonRule
Mar 25
#40