Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

highplainsdem

(55,418 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 09:00 PM Mar 25

Mike Waltz: I take"full responsibility" but Goldberg could've tricked his way into the chat & ELON will investigate [View all]

I wondered how soon they'd get around to blaming Jeffrey Goldberg.

I started checking news and Bluesky posts this evening and immediately ran into conflicting info on what Waltz was saying.

Aaron Rupar had video from the Ingraham Angle with this comment in a Bluesky post: https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3llaf6bhasf2w

Wow — Mike Waltz on Fox News suggests Jeffrey Goldberg somehow schemed his way into the Signal group instead of just being invited by accident


Meanwhile The Independent ran with this headline - "Mike Waltz takes ‘full responsibility’ for leaked Trump administration Signal chat about Yemen strike" - which I did NOT post in LBN because it's so misleading. The article
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mike-waltz-apology-yemen-signal-b2721561.html
doesn't show how little reponsibility Waltz is taking till the third paragraph:

National security advisor Mike Waltz said he accepted “full responsibility” for a high-level Trump administration planning chat about strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen being accidentally shared with a top journalist from The Atlantic.

"I take full responsibility. I built the group," Waltz told Fox News’s Ingraham Angle on Tuesday. "It's embarrassing. We're going to get to the bottom of it."

Waltz went on to call Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, who wrote a widely read article claiming Waltz added him to a Signal group discussing the strikes, was a “loser” who may have “deliberately” tricked someone in the administration into getting access to the chat.


I was looking for articles with more of what Waltz said and found the most quotes from that show in the NY Post, which I'm quoting only because the conspiracy theory he's setting up is dangerous and DUers should be aware of it.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/25/us-news/national-security-adviser-mike-waltz-takes-full-responsibility-for-embarrassing-signal-leak/

“Have you ever had somebody’s contact that shows their name and then you have somebody else’s number there?” Waltz began.

“So, of course I didn’t see this loser in the group,” he continued, referring to Goldberg, who is viewed by many as an antagonist of Trump. “It looked like someone else.

“Now, whether he did it deliberately or it happened by some other technical means is something we’re trying to figure out.”

-snip-

“I just talked to Elon on the way here,” Waltz said. “We’ve got the best technical minds looking at how this happened.”
-snip-


Waltz then told Ingraham, "I can tell you for 100% — I don’t know this guy." And he's desperate that people believe him because otherwise the most likely reason Waltz had contact info for Jeffrey Goldberg was that Waltz has leaked to the press in the past and has some contact info handy.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They immediately started blaming Goldberg. SheltieLover Mar 25 #1
Their initial sliming of Goldberg was accusing him of past "hoaxes" that weren't hoaxes. This is the highplainsdem Mar 25 #7
"Elon will investigate" Skittles Mar 25 #2
Just like when Trump stated it was generous of Putin to offer to investigate dirty deeds. John1956PA Mar 25 #8
Moron hires moron to investigate his moronic Johonny Mar 25 #3
The whole point is to change the narrative from the fact they were using Signal in the first place crimycarny Mar 25 #4
I don't think "taking full responsibility" means what he thinks it means. Uncle Joe Mar 25 #5
Waltz goes on Faux to change his story, thereby causing the viewers to get enraged. John1956PA Mar 25 #12
Wait what?? These are the people in charge of protecting the country. The national security advisor is saying he was tulipsandroses Mar 25 #6
This orangecrush Mar 25 #10
Well of course. If a 'lone' journalist could somehow trick his way in, Abolishinist Mar 26 #21
'Full Responsibility' DET Mar 25 #9
Elon is now investigating intelligence breaches? WTAF? Prairie Gates Mar 25 #11
Mr. Goldberg, release the contents, they all swore there are no classified documents spanone Mar 25 #13
Maybe he is showing responsibility that they don't. He doesn't want to put anyone's lives in danger because of leaks Walleye Mar 25 #14
Full responsibility would mean that you have resigned. chowder66 Mar 25 #15
I'm sorry but if it was that easy for some random journalist Crunchy Frog Mar 25 #16
Yes. If he tricked his way into the chat, that is admitting weak security. Norrrm Mar 25 #17
Putin's already in there. I'm pretty sure that anything Tulsi hears Crunchy Frog Mar 25 #18
We've all made contact mistakes. rickyhall Mar 25 #19
Aggressive idiot. moondust Mar 25 #20
why is he still digging? FFS, STFU already! Dude sounds dumber ecstatic Mar 26 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Waltz: I take"full r...