Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeyeblue

(5,844 posts)
54. It wouldn't surprise me
Sun Mar 30, 2025, 02:05 PM
Sunday

I don't think career military and intelligence people are going to stand idle while Trump tries to burn everything down.

Everything Trump has done in the last 2 months can be fixed.

The point in time when he really puts our nation at a high risk--a really high risk--I think there will be intervention.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick SheltieLover Sunday #1
OH in my wettest of dreams! HAB911 Sunday #2
I hope this is true. yardwork Sunday #3
I thought the same. A highly credible responsible journalist. Would have been a very different story had it been Amaryllis Sunday #32
Most reporters wouldn't have had the clout to publish it. yardwork Sunday #38
My thoughts exactly when it first came out. NotHardly Sunday #59
Direct Hit ZDU Sunday #4
United States Military Academy West Point NJCher Sunday #5
But he also is a federally convicted fraudster/money launderer who did prison time. Celerity Sunday #13
good to know NJCher Sunday #22
yw Celerity Sunday #23
That's interesting to know - but the fact that he's a crook doesn't mean he's wrong Ocelot II Sunday #81
So, is this a nothing burger? ReRe Sunday #98
faces up as grifting, especially the price increase Celerity Sunday #100
Grifting? Looks like a common substack subscription pitch, on its face. But I don't know the guy. chia Sunday #105
Looks like substack to me too. MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #132
Ugh. progressoid Monday #142
Who provides info to Wikipedia? "Anyone can edit" MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #133
You reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works and how to use it. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #145
I REALLY want to believe something like this is going on. Nittersing Sunday #6
Whole article is fascinating, and plausible Wild blueberry Sunday #7
One cell is not enough. That is the information cell. Tetrachloride Sunday #8
It's either this article NJCher Sunday #24
looking forward to seeing Tetrachloride Sunday #111
The Deep State SilasSouleII Sunday #129
Very interesting, but birdographer Sunday #9
your question NJCher Sunday #17
It is more than protecting national security ButchMcMuffin Sunday #72
and how many et tu Sunday #86
I'm skeptical of some of this EdmondDantes_ Sunday #10
Do we even know for sure it was Waltz who added Goldberg? He has no recollection of so doing. They all seemed to be Amaryllis Sunday #35
Yet, he said he would take full responsibility SheltieLover Sunday #43
Yes, Waltz invited him. There's a screenshot. Shipwack Sunday #77
But who gave Waltz Goldberg's private cell number in the first place? Ocelot II Sunday #79
That is a very interesting question... Shipwack Sunday #84
But even if they were looking for a different JG, a DoD employee whose number Ocelot II Sunday #85
I meant using the search function in signal, not an official government directory. Shipwack Sunday #92
Goldberg implied he was trying to interview Waltz about something else. summer_in_TX Monday #139
Goldberg said this morning SARose Sunday #87
That's interesting - not that Goldberg and Waltz had met, which isn't surprising Ocelot II Sunday #93
I hate to be a pessimist SARose Sunday #99
Photos AncientOfDays Sunday #102
i suspect... orchidlady Sunday #116
You might be thinking of Jonah Goldberg; Jeffrey is a liberal, Ocelot II Sunday #117
Could someone in Waltz orbit have simply picked up his phone? pat_k Sunday #101
Yes, that definitely is a possibility. Shipwack Monday #137
That's what I've been wondering. nt Susan Calvin Sunday #11
This explanation is heartening peggysue2 Sunday #12
reference to deep throat is a reference to the water gate scandel where operatives broke into democratic headquartes @ AllaN01Bear Sunday #14
Yes Yes Yes...We all know ButchMcMuffin Sunday #60
Interesting....thank you democrank Sunday #15
Fanciful and speculative Prairie Gates Sunday #16
Let's see you come up with a better explanation NJCher Sunday #21
The simplest explanation is far, far better: the Trumpies are idiots Prairie Gates Sunday #26
yes that's true NJCher Sunday #36
His argument seeks to associate two things with only the slightest connection Prairie Gates Sunday #40
show me the pattern of grifting NJCher Sunday #41
Yeah, I'm a "defraud me once" kind of guy Prairie Gates Sunday #49
all legal NJCher Sunday #57
LOL Prairie Gates Sunday #61
I'm not going to discuss NJCher Sunday #63
It's literally what you're doing Prairie Gates Sunday #64
the word NJCher Sunday #66
Prairie Gates is using the word "literally" correctly but attacking the word is all you are reduced to Bernardo de La Paz Monday #148
My point NJCher Monday #154
Your point that it is "overused" is pointless and logically has nothing to do with Prairie Gates proper use. Bernardo de La Paz Monday #158
Meditation? Link me. Now you want to diss meditiation? Bernardo de La Paz Monday #159
his 'academic credentials' do nothing to prop up what stopdiggin Sunday #55
see my NJCher Sunday #65
no. it's about whether THIS piece has any real backing stopdiggin Sunday #82
He also consistently misspelled Waltz's name. n/t TygrBright Sunday #125
also NJCher Sunday #45
Yes, that's all true, but how did Waltz get Goldberg's private cell number? Ocelot II Sunday #83
This guy is saying that someone got hold of Waltz's phone and inserted Goldberg's number muriel_volestrangler Sunday #58
Thanks. I'd been wondering you JG might be. underpants Sunday #96
Yes, but the more I think about it.... yardwork Sunday #68
I agree, what I cannot figure out is why the Mump circus isn't exterminated yet Tumbulu Sunday #95
I think that you are right CitizenZero Sunday #121
Agreed CitizenZero Sunday #120
I agree. This seems like it takes several big leaps over the obvious. underpants Sunday #97
I don't think I buy this. I hep someone is doing this but I really have my doubts about this. Autumn Sunday #18
to discard the idea NJCher Sunday #27
problem with this train of thought stopdiggin Sunday #42
the problem with this train of thought NJCher Sunday #47
I can't even begin to follow ... stopdiggin Sunday #62
Right. That just isn't going to happen. Autumn Sunday #90
Agreed! SheltieLover Sunday #48
I understand. People want the military to save us because we have been told they protects us. Autumn Sunday #94
Just because something is possible is not an argument FOR its actuality Bernardo de La Paz Monday #149
I like this possibility Red Mountain Sunday #19
People want to believe stuff like this, because then they don't have to save themselves and others. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #20
all those people out demonstrating in the streets NJCher Sunday #29
Thanks for posting this. I will be out on April 5th trying to save our democracy h2ebits Sunday #76
I really want to believe this kkmarie Sunday #88
I am always amazed at the factual DENVERPOPS Sunday #25
RE: Fox News, broadcast on the Armed Forces Network around the world, as the only news source. reACTIONary Sunday #37
Thank you DENVERPOPS Sunday #46
I think what Denverpops was referring to was the fact that, if you're on a military base, they usually BComplex Sunday #80
really fascinating... FirstLight Sunday #28
I am so grateful we still have patriotic Americans WhiteTara Sunday #30
kinda doubt it. the first 'leak' mentioned stopdiggin Sunday #31
Recommended. H2O Man Sunday #33
Being an old H2O Man Sunday #123
Well that gives me hope Saoirse9 Sunday #128
It is important H2O Man Sunday #131
Aaaahhh. A reprise. Saoirse9 Monday #138
Smart analysis. Thanks. Pepsidog Sunday #34
This is bullshit. There is no .... reACTIONary Sunday #39
nope NJCher Sunday #51
Nobody else is coming up with this scenario ... stopdiggin Sunday #69
Excuse me but I have tears in my eyes NJCher Monday #144
ah, yes. the 'independent thinker' stopdiggin Monday #150
Only by the hopelessly naive. NJCher Monday #152
and those that believe that things like evolution and vaccines stopdiggin Monday #155
Those items have nothing to do with NJCher Monday #157
Quoting from your own post stopdiggin Monday #160
95+% of ALL Media in the U.S. ( as mentioned in reply above) dweller Sunday #44
If slobby were ever completely ignored, even for 48 hrs, he would shrivel up & croak SheltieLover Sunday #56
K&R spanone Sunday #50
There's a lot we don't know about this story. This could be one aspect. (If there's a deep US cell which added wiggs Sunday #52
That is very wishful thinking. choie Sunday #53
Ehhhh NJCher Monday #146
It wouldn't surprise me Buckeyeblue Sunday #54
The editor of the Atlantic almost to good to be true. gordianot Sunday #67
Cell? Kid Berwyn Sunday #70
Michael Waltz probably thought it would cool to include a journalist on the chat... AntiFascist Sunday #71
Or he meant to add somebody else. Voltaire2 Sunday #75
It really doesn't work that way NJCher Monday #147
I have 2 theories on who it is mercuryblues Sunday #73
AFAIK it was Waltz who added Greenberg. Voltaire2 Sunday #74
Perhaps some hacker had cloned Waltz's phone? intrepidity Sunday #106
bogus conspiracy theories are frequently identified by their need to add on new explanations Voltaire2 Sunday #108
I've been thinking Blue_Roses Sunday #78
Take the time to read the entire article. It will definitely improve your state of mind. flashman13 Sunday #89
I agree. Click the link. Read the whole article. Silver Gaia Sunday #124
I agree.... Viz Sunday #135
This message was self-deleted by its author Viz Sunday #136
I just hate it when they write Walz for Waltz. tavernier Sunday #91
This would give poo poo King the green light to purge the deep state. GreenWave Sunday #103
Seriously? Are we really supposed to believe Bluetus Sunday #104
"reuck"? Bernardo de La Paz Monday #153
I hope so seta1950 Sunday #107
I find it strange that Vance was the one that said he thought it was a mistake. doc03 Sunday #109
We need both Deep throat and anonymous to report the criminality of this illegal administration and expose that they're kimbutgar Sunday #110
As if they know Bettie Sunday #112
After Rebl2 Sunday #113
What plan? Meowmee Sunday #114
my bet .... DoBW Sunday #115
In order to save my country, I need to betray it. Xolodno Sunday #118
"rank and file member"? Hah! Look it up again or for the first time . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #156
Thanks for posting NJCher. Verrrrry in-ter-es-ting! Clouds Passing Sunday #119
I have a journalist friend who postulated this on Facebook Maeve Sunday #122
Whether this article is true or not, it will ratchet up the regime's paranoia... TygrBright Sunday #126
thanks...interesting read stillcool Sunday #127
I mentioned this in a prev. thread proud patriot Sunday #130
Thanks for this MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #134
It has been cold pontooning weather of late Blue Owl Monday #140
Link to another post about the same substack author writing a follow up article CitizenZero Monday #141
The OP sounds like spy fiction CitizenZero Monday #143
The writer says he is NJCher Monday #151
There is no need for a witch hunt. When you add someone to a Signal group (I use the app)... Pacifist Patriot Monday #161
"Never rush to attribute to malice that which may simply be due to incompetence." eppur_se_muova Monday #162
Then don't leak information that compromises sensitive information HereForTheParty Monday #163
Oh, how I hope this is true. sekha68 Monday #164
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A powerful cell is operat...»Reply #54