Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whopis01

(3,807 posts)
22. Here is how I see it working
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 11:05 AM
Monday

When you say that "consumers will cut back on spending", I think it is more correct to say "consumers will cut back on purchasing".

Meaning that they will be spending the same amount, just getting less for it. Consumers have a limited budget to spend from. As prices increase across the board, a larger percentage of that money will be spent on essentials. So spending doesn't really go down - just what you get for that amount of money goes down.

In the case of tariffed products, the additional cost is a tax, paid for by the consumer. Those consumers are receiving the same income and paying the same income tax - so this is in addition to what taxes they would have paid otherwise. So there are your additional taxes to offset cuts elsewhere.

The lower you are on the income scale, the greater a percentage of your budget goes towards essentials. That means you have less choices to reduce spending, or even invest instead of spending. The higher percentage of essentials in your budget, the harder you will be hit by this and the more taxes you will end up paying.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I do not see how inflation gab13by13 Monday #1
Since Jan. 20th or so, I'm only buying essentials and helping family wolfie001 Monday #7
They won't, of course krkaufman Monday #14
Here is how I see it working whopis01 Monday #22
They are spinning the tariffs as being a tax cut Blue Full Moon Monday #2
Tariffs are taxes. I usually write "tariff tax" instead of just "tariff", to make the point clear and repeat it. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #5
To Canada, only 34% of the voting pool pulled the lever for that fat orange moron wolfie001 Monday #8
My protest sign for this weekend Blue Full Moon Monday #10
That's the way. Short, sweet, very understandable. +1 . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Monday #12
Math is not their strength. C_U_L8R Monday #3
And conning their idiots into believing they care for them while all they want is their money. Justice matters. Monday #19
Econ geniuses think swapping tariff tax for income tax is worth the cost of tanking the economy Bernardo de La Paz Monday #4
"Ha ha. American proles are Suckers and Losers. Ha ha." - G.O.P. BoRaGard Monday #6
Old King George learned a thing or two about tariff-taxes bucolic_frolic Monday #9
Tariffs and retaliatory tariffs mean less growth or even contraction, which means less tax revenue and more outgoing aid unblock Monday #11
They will fail miserably. twodogsbarking Monday #13
Ok, as usual, I'm confused by Republican thinking... surfered Monday #15
I'll Add This modrepub Monday #23
Alexander Hamilton initially wanted tariffs to fund the centralized government Deminpenn Monday #16
Who do they think pays tariffs? IronLionZion Monday #17
Mexico will after they finish paying for the wall. Ray Bruns Monday #18
Whereas in Canada our PM (if elected) Bev54 Monday #20
I've been buying things that I think might need to be replaced since he started his Autumn Monday #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"And many Republicans see...»Reply #22