General Discussion

Ocelot II

(125,862 posts)

4. Plant DEI. Woke trees. Can't have that, can we?

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Mon Jun 30, 2025, 01:25 PM

Jun 30

Maybe they'll require cities to plant only dioecious trees (those that have separate male and female individuals), like boxelder, persimmon, white ash, ginkgo, holly, red cedar, aspen and willow; but trees that produce male and female parts - pollen and fruit - on the same individual will be forbidden. So, no oak, maple, birch or pine trees because obviously those trees are bi or gay or trans or whatever. There are two genders, male and female, and trees shouldn't be able to break the rules and be all DEI like that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

RandomNumbers

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Indianapolis lost federal matching funds for replanting trees because of the word "diversity" in biodiversity [View all] In It to Win It Jun 30 OP

They obviously should have used the better more beautiful word BioAmerica Prairie Gates Jun 30 #1

Yes, because even trees put whiny white men at a disadvantage. tulipsandroses Jun 30 #2

Gott im himmel. tanyev Jun 30 #3

Plant DEI. Woke trees. Can't have that, can we? Ocelot II Jun 30 #4

hey don't give them ideas! RandomNumbers Jun 30 #6

My city has planted a number of ginkgo trees along the boulevards, Ocelot II Jun 30 #10

The stupidity RandomNumbers Jun 30 #5

Indianapolis should be "detained" and deported to Andorra or Belize. Ping Tung Jun 30 #7

In Indiana 58.6% voted for this. spanone Jun 30 #8

Thought this was a joke initially ChcioInf Jun 30 #9

Frigging NAZIs don't miss a thing. Kid Berwyn Jun 30 #11

There's growing evidence that ignorance of context House of Roberts Jun 30 #12

Was just thinking: Ignorance isn't bliss Attilatheblond Jun 30 #13