Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(126,066 posts)
6. So the handful of $10M winners will stimulate the economy how?
Mon Jun 30, 2025, 02:47 PM
Jun 30

Last edited Mon Jun 30, 2025, 03:37 PM - Edit history (1)

What if they invest their money in hedge funds or transfer it to offshore accounts or spend it all on hookers and blow? Even if they started legit businesses, that isn't nearly enough money to significantly affect the economy. The solution isn't eliminating billionaires, it's taxing them at much higher marginal tax rates. I wouldn't be inspired to vote for a candidate who came up with something like this because (1) it would never pass any Congress; (2) if it did, it would be vetoed by the current sitting president; and (3) it would be struck down as unconstitutional by this or any other SCOTUS. Amendment XVI states: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. But there is no authority for Congress to levy a tax on assets. Furthermore, a tax not intended as a revenue source but as confiscatory (taking more than the government's property interest) has been held unconstitutional, Tyler v. Hennepin County.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The next Democratic candi...»Reply #6