Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

yardwork

(67,753 posts)

3. The only reason they haven't published it is to protect Republicans.

Reply to intrepidity (Original post)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 07:52 AM

Jul 18

All the WSJ cares about is money.

If a Democratic politician had done this the WSJ would have published it right before the election, when it would go the most damage.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

newdeal2 still-prayin4rain amortus716

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maybe they didn't publish the actual drawing because [View all] intrepidity Jul 18 OP

I like that his signature "mimics pubic hair" BWdem4life Jul 18 #1

My guess is that the drawing looks like Ivanka maxrandb Jul 18 #2

The only reason they haven't published it is to protect Republicans. yardwork Jul 18 #3