This is called threshold bias and is the result of investigators making up their minds about the case
the minute they walk into the crime scene. And dismissing all evidence to the contrary.
I don't know what really happened. But there are a number of valid theories to consider.
One of my interests in crime scene staging, where a murder is staged to look like suicide, an accident, or kidnapping, etc.
This is done by the murderer or the family of the victim.
This happens more than people realize and law enforcement officials are the best stagers.
They know how to make a crime scene look like suicide.
And FYI coroners and forensic pathologists can be fooled into thinking a murder is a suicide or accident.
Also any pathologist on the case who was federal employee is questionable in their testimony due to pressure
from the Trump regime.
I am also a PhD trained as a scientist. Valid data or theories are not dismissed to fit a preconceived narrative.
You must always follow the data.
It is quite plausible that this was a murder. It would not have been difficult to send two trained men into
Epstein's cell. It would have been easy to hold him down, strangle him with the implement found around his neck,
strangle him in a way to mimic a hanging. The two men could have posed as federal attorneys/investigators, or workmen,
fellow inmates, etc.
Trump had the entire federal govt at his disposal, and there are people quite well trained to do this kind of work
in the federal workforce. They spend their lives training for such events.
The series of coincidences puts the suicide theory into question. As they say, confidences take a lot of planning.
The release of more incriminating data gives Trump more motive. All roads lead back to Trump in terms of the Epstein
child sex ring. It is also a fact that Trump is a vicious, ruthless psychopath who will destroy anyone who gets in is way.
And of course Virginia Giuffre was the victim of notorious high level international figures, so others had motives as well.