Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)LA Grand Juries Are Refusing to Indict ICE Protestors [View all]
trump's DOJ are trying to intimidate ICE protestors. Luckily we have grand jury who are no-billing these attempts
Link to tweet
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/morning-memo/la-grand-juries-are-refusing-to-indict-ice-protestors
A major new development out of Los Angeles, where the LA Times reports that U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli has been no-billed by grand juries in some attempted prosecutions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protestors:
But among the most damning revelations in the LA Times article is Essayli ordering a subordinate to ignore the DOJs Justice Manual:
The Trump administration targeted Los Angeles for heavy-handed immigration enforcement, including deploying the National Guard and active duty marines to the Democratic-run city, that set off mass protests and some street clashes with law enforcement.
The three officials who spoke to The Times on condition of anonymity said prosecutors have struggled to get several protest-related cases past grand juries, which need only to find probable cause that a crime has been committed in order to move forward. That is a much lower bar than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard required for a criminal conviction.
But among the most damning revelations in the LA Times article is Essayli ordering a subordinate to ignore the DOJs Justice Manual:
On the overheard call, according to the three officials, Essayli, 39, told a subordinate to disregard the federal governments Justice Manual, which directs prosecutors to bring only cases they can win at trial. Essayli barked that prosecutors should press on and secure indictments as directed by U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi, according to the three officials.
The Trump administration targeted Los Angeles for heavy-handed immigration enforcement, including deploying the National Guard and active duty marines to the Democratic-run city, that set off mass protests and some street clashes with law enforcement.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

I am so pleased to read that some grand juries are refusing to indict Ice protestors.
CaliforniaPeggy
Jul 24
#1
Wait, they are trying to deny justice to people who are not Trrumpers. That is a no no no. No.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#8
Thanks for reading it. I meant to say "deny" instead of "do". I srewed up. Mea culpa.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#21
This is why we need regular people to answer their jury duty summons!
questionseverything
Jul 24
#12
Is it "jury nullification" or a righteous reaction to "trumped up" charges?
Midnight Writer
Jul 24
#27
I don't think this is nullification, that happens if jurors believe the defendant technically broke the law
questionseverything
Jul 24
#34