Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: While folks continue to attack Garland [View all]swong19104
(468 posts)64. It would be monstrously funny
If Garland would pipe in, perhaps in about two months from now, that he has the original Epstein client list with actual Epstein handwritten comments on the margins.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Yes. Garland has no power now. Bondi is ruining lives NOW. Focus, folks. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 24
#1
The fact is, we would not be in this mess if Garland had done his real job, which was to uphold the law
Escurumbele
Jul 24
#38
"Things took off visibly, with great speed as soon as Jack Smith was appointed." Things took off invisibly, too.
ancianita
Jul 24
#55
Fine. I strongly disagree. You can also take these informed opinions of judicial/legal experts over a year ago.
ancianita
Jul 24
#73
Leave it to the historians. Picking those bones now doesn't help us deal with Blondi and tRump and Miller and .... . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 24
#50
There was an opportunity, but the SC was not enlarged when calls went out.
Abstractartist
Jul 24
#36
The media is a huge part of our problem by both sidesing GOP extremism for decades
LymphocyteLover
Jul 24
#20
I assume you are being sarcastic but Garland was not nearly as much of a problem as SCOTUS
LymphocyteLover
Jul 24
#23
For Watergate, it wasn't the crime ... it was the cover-up that involved a President
FakeNoose
Jul 24
#84
I don't even like to see a comparison of Watergate and this administration.
Trueblue Texan
Jul 24
#13
What a lot of us are saying is that if Merrick Garland had acted more forcefully and with...
Ol Janx Spirit
Jul 24
#16
Sounds like yr not aware of the investigation timeline. Here's a good summary:
emulatorloo
Jul 24
#41
Learn from the past - don't complain and whine about it. Pretty sure it can't be changed.
NoMoreRepugs
Jul 24
#18
The damage Garland left behind cannot be changed, but that does not mean we should forget, on the contrary,
Escurumbele
Jul 24
#39
The DOJ role of Attorney General has traditionally been filled by attorneys due to its legal responsibilities.
ancianita
Jul 24
#48
"A plague on both their houses" talk is simple minded bothsider bullshit. See my 3rd post in the thread (#42)
ancianita
Jul 24
#46
People connected to Epstein are highly motivated. Not just the law, but wives, family, friends, entire life reputation
RoeVWade
Jul 24
#65
Thank you for steering toward the real problem we might actually do something about
Hassler
Jul 24
#76
This makes Watergate look like slipping a Hershey bar into your pocket at a 7-11.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 24
#77
Well, I will venture to say that we can definitely attack Garland AND Bondi at the same time.
PatrickforB
Jul 24
#79
Your statement is true, as are many people have made about Garland. It's not either/or. That said, though, you are
Karasu
Jul 24
#81