Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LA Grand Juries Are Refusing to Indict ICE Protestors [View all]Midnight Writer
(24,635 posts)27. Is it "jury nullification" or a righteous reaction to "trumped up" charges?
A lot of these ICE arrests seem to be peaceful, lawful protesters being victimized by over-aggressive and poorly-trained deputized thugs.
Do the authorities in these cases have any evidence that the protesters went beyond their First Amendment Rights?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I am so pleased to read that some grand juries are refusing to indict Ice protestors.
CaliforniaPeggy
Jul 24
#1
Wait, they are trying to deny justice to people who are not Trrumpers. That is a no no no. No.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#8
Thanks for reading it. I meant to say "deny" instead of "do". I srewed up. Mea culpa.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#21
This is why we need regular people to answer their jury duty summons!
questionseverything
Jul 24
#12
Is it "jury nullification" or a righteous reaction to "trumped up" charges?
Midnight Writer
Jul 24
#27
I don't think this is nullification, that happens if jurors believe the defendant technically broke the law
questionseverything
Jul 24
#34