General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Social Security Recipients Set to Get Benefit Cuts [View all]SickOfTheOnePct
(8,394 posts)...but it seems to me that only counting the years that a woman is in the workforce would actually help her benefits. Right now, if there are only 30 years of work, the average used to calculate benefits is based on 30 years of wages and five years with zero wages, bringing down the average.
If a woman was only in the workforce for 30 years, and the average was based on that 30 years, then her average would be higher.
For example (using very simple numbers, no pay raises, etc.), a woman working for 30 years at $50,000/year would make $1,500,000.
Using the current formula, her average salary for determining benefits would be $42, 857.14 ($1,500,000/35)
Using only her working years, her average salary for determining benefits would $50,000 ($1,500,000/30).
What am I missing?
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):