Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LA Grand Juries Are Refusing to Indict ICE Protestors [View all]usonian
(20,230 posts)44. I live for word play.
Just posted in the "Why are Thomas' English Muffins so darn good?" thread in the lounge.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10182204164
Spoiler:
Because they have crooks and nannies, like an Avengers' episode.
A French teacher explained it in French.
A play on words is "Jeu de mots laids" (play on ugly words),
which sounds almost the same as
"Jeu de mollets", which is playing with legs 🦵
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I am so pleased to read that some grand juries are refusing to indict Ice protestors.
CaliforniaPeggy
Jul 24
#1
Wait, they are trying to deny justice to people who are not Trrumpers. That is a no no no. No.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#8
Thanks for reading it. I meant to say "deny" instead of "do". I srewed up. Mea culpa.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#21
This is why we need regular people to answer their jury duty summons!
questionseverything
Jul 24
#12
Is it "jury nullification" or a righteous reaction to "trumped up" charges?
Midnight Writer
Jul 24
#27
I don't think this is nullification, that happens if jurors believe the defendant technically broke the law
questionseverything
Jul 24
#34