Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(37,626 posts)
8. The legal question is the interpretation of the 14th amendment.
Tue Jul 29, 2025, 10:21 PM
Jul 29

Trump's contention is that people who are in the US illegally are not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," so they aren't citizens under the 14th amendment - unless their parent's status (citizenship or some other status) makes them subject to the jurisdiction of the US

I think it is ludicrous interpretation. If they aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the US, then there is no basis to hold them to the laws of this country (either for criminal matters or deportation). But that is the contention.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Parents may need to prove...»Reply #8