Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump Just Released His Plan to Revoke Birthright Citizenship. It's Worse Than Imagined. [View all]Ms. Toad
(37,658 posts)59. Good thought -
But changes in how the existing constitution is interpreted (i.e. not a new law) is treated differently than a new law. As to the application of the constitution in a criminal context, it is a two-step process. They first decide the correct interpretation going forward. Then, generally in a later case, they determine whether it only applies going forward, or also applies retroactively.
Here, the issue isn't - on its face - a criminal matter. Usually they would wait to decide any criminal implications that come up later (like whether a child born into the United States who is not a citizen is guilty of being in the United without legal right to be here (a misdemeanor).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Trump Just Released His Plan to Revoke Birthright Citizenship. It's Worse Than Imagined. [View all]
sheshe2
Jul 31
OP
This is about Trump operating by Chaos Doctrine and Shock Doctrine & getting away with it
Hekate
Aug 1
#65
How can the Constitution be changed by executive order when an amendment is required for changes?
wnylib
Aug 1
#67
But, the children born in this country are subject to its jurisdiction, as are their parents, whether documented or not.
wnylib
Aug 5
#86
Also, ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3
Celerity
Aug 1
#46
Why Feb 20, 2025? Why not the day it was signed? Is 2/20 the date Heritage Foundation wrote it?
LiberalArkie
Aug 1
#70
Does that mean that his 4 children born of immigrants can also be stripped of birthright citizenship?
kimbutgar
Jul 31
#7
Once denying birthright citizenship becomes acceptable, even if it's only for those born after a certain date,
sop
Jul 31
#17
Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with
Celerity
Aug 1
#47
The only thing that needs to be removed are these shitheads from the White House.
Initech
Jul 31
#16
My daughter-in-law's parents were not citizens when they had her although she was born here.
summer_in_TX
Jul 31
#24