Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Happy Hoosier

(9,301 posts)
1. Of course, but the alternative is horrifying
Fri Nov 21, 2025, 02:04 PM
Friday

The use of deadly military force is an horrific final option. It's brutal. It's irreversible. There must be some constraint on it, and it is a burdern that must be carried by everyone under arms. Traditionally, enlisted folks are not usually held directly responsible for the execution of illegal orders. Enlisted people have fewer opportunities to object, especially when engaged in combat. Officers, however, have a duty to ensure that they are complying with the law of war and the U.S. Consitution. There are certainly gray areas. But we cannot and MUST not turn our military forces into unquestioning killing machines who dare not examine the legality of their actions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Following illegal orders....»Reply #1