Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(23,129 posts)
5. No wonder they don't report the money they get from rich people and organizations!
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 03:41 PM
Jan 5

From the Rank-Has-Its-Privilege$-Works-for-Them-in-Robes-Too Department:

131 federal judges failed to recuse themselves from cases in which they had financial interest



131 federal judges failed to recuse themselves from cases in which they had financial interest: report

BY MONIQUE BEALS
The Hill (from WSJ)- 09/28/21

One hundred and thirty-one federal judges oversaw court cases involving companies in which they or their family members owned stock, according to a new investigation.

Those judges violated U.S. law and judicial ethics as they failed to recuse themselves from a total of 685 court cases in which they may have had a conflict of interest, an investigation by The Wall Street Journal found.

In those cases, about two-thirds of the rulings were in favor of the financial interests of the judge, the Journal reported.

Snip…

After the Journal notified the judges of its findings, 56 of them began to alert parties involved in 329 of the lawsuits of their conflict of interest.

Continues…

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/574244-131-federal-judges-failed-to-recuse-themselves-from-cases-in-which

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Increasingl...»Reply #5