Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Coventina

(29,209 posts)
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 12:01 PM Yesterday

The Quest to 'Make America Fertile Again' Stalls Under Trump [View all]

Vice President JD Vance last week called falling marriage rates “a big problem.” The deputy secretary of Health and Human Services in December urged his agency to “make America fertile again.” And at a recent conference for young conservatives, Sean Duffy, the transportation secretary, doubled down on the importance of marriage and children, holding out his nine kids as a model for others to follow.

But one year into President Trump’s second term, his administration has enacted few policies to reduce the rising cost of having children — frustrating some conservatives who expected Mr. Trump to prioritize their plans to boost the U.S. birthrate as it continues to drop.

Some Republicans in Congress and leading conservative policy groups have pushed unsuccessfully to significantly expand tax credits for families or introduce a “baby bonus” for all new moms, proposals that Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance had championed in the past. Mr. Trump’s plans for combating infertility have also largely stalled out, after the administration announced a new policy on in vitro fertilization in October that fell far short of Mr. Trump’s campaign promise to make the procedure free.

“If your version of being pro-family is talking about how great families are and encouraging people to get married and have kids, you end up doing a lot of lip service without changing the material and economic conditions on the ground,” said Patrick T. Brown, who focuses on family policy at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center. “Just the bully pulpit alone is not really enough.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/13/us/politics/trump-birthrates-infertility.html

**************************************************************************************

OK, speaking as woman who is now past her child-bearing years: I am so thankful that I have no surviving children.

This world is FUCKED, and AFAIAC, the human race can't go extinct quickly enough. We've tortured and killed enough of our fellow creatures to prove that we don't deserve this lovely planet. (I'm speaking collectively here, I know that there are many caring people out there, but we are VASTLY outnumbered). There is something deeply wrong and cruel about our species.

If I were a young woman right now, I would probably opt for PERMANENT birth control, given that I would not have any guaranteed bodily autonomy in this country. I can see more an more women following the Korean 4B movement.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aside from a genuine minority, and a small minority at that, PoindexterOglethorpe Yesterday #1
Especially when the small tax incentives are offset by defending Head Start EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #5
Is his couch pregnant? Ping Tung Yesterday #2
The Nazis had a program called "Lebensborn." Ocelot II Yesterday #3
And of course, for the Germans that weren't being murdered BaronChocula Yesterday #17
Trumps 'baby bonus" was only $1,000 and could not be withdrawn until age 18....... riversedge Yesterday #4
That program is as useless as a chocolate teapot. Ocelot II Yesterday #7
So. What's the problem? Kid Berwyn Yesterday #6
"women's bodies have a way to shut that down" lapfog_1 Yesterday #8
You also need social support DBoon Yesterday #15
40% of women of reproductive age want to move out of the US Quiet Em Yesterday #9
Not surprised. Most of the young women I know want to have careers not babies and as to husbands they are totally not efhmc Yesterday #27
For some odd reason, this instills in me a horrible thought. Disaffected Yesterday #10
Remember the book/film "the Boys from Brazil" IcyPeas Yesterday #12
Yes, I've seen that. Disaffected Yesterday #20
Sure do HighFired49 Yesterday #22
Stephen Miller? Coventina Yesterday #26
Eloon's spooge probably pollutes every sperm bank in the world. Ocelot II Yesterday #18
I don't think they have "sufficient funds" BaronChocula Yesterday #21
Trump maybe not but Miller & Hegseth Disaffected Yesterday #25
Rotten Roast Beef Farts. C_U_L8R Yesterday #11
There is something deeply wrong and cruel about our species. patphil Yesterday #13
"Have more children, please." isn't a good message from a pedophile flvegan Yesterday #14
They're too busy f-ing over common people over our money and freedom Jerry2144 Yesterday #16
On a planet with over EIGHT BILLION humans on it... love_katz Yesterday #19
Want women to have more babies? Dulcinea Yesterday #23
If trump makes you horny, you shouldn't have children. (nt) Paladin Yesterday #24
Does vomit count? efhmc Yesterday #29
Just wondering. What is the percentage of wives of the members of the Orange Idiot's administration are from foreign efhmc Yesterday #28
Have they considered tanning their balls? underpants Yesterday #30
I thought it was their taints? Coventina Yesterday #31
😳 underpants Yesterday #33
Birth rates drop like a rock when the economy sours Warpy Yesterday #32
A flabby orange clown who hasn't been able to see his own dick for over 40 years ... 11 Bravo Yesterday #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Quest to 'Make Americ...