Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,440 posts)
48. Garland handed over a fast moving investigation to Smith who brought an indictment with more than enough time to convict
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 02:10 PM
Yesterday

...but the Trump allies in the courts prevented it from going to trial.

Likewise, making Democratic leaders the target of this ire is seriously misleading and just false.

They don't make those decisions on their own, nor are they responsible for who voters sent them in the pathetic numbers that we saw in the last election.

People constantly set up these performative expectations for Democrats as if chattering about it on the internet was some substitute for the actual legislative realities that these Dem leaders face.

NO Democrat voted for the funding being advantaged right now. There is no legislative vehicle for Democrats to undo that funding right now.

Both leaders are working with the legislators who elected them to represent them. They aren't going to make those negotiations or decisions with the press. They just aren't. They make those decisions through the consensus of the caucus.

Voters didn't elect the leadership of those bodies of Congress; the legislators in the respective parties did that; so casting them as more consequential than the people mulling on their own votes behind them is just silliness.

Besides, who is saying they will vote for ANY republican budget resolution or initiative? What Democrat has said that?

Just as Garland had zero control over how quickly the courts dispatched the record number of frivolous appeals to every scrap of evidence or testimony sought - including the successful effort which began well before Smith came onboard to obtain the testimony of key WH officials and attorneys against privilege claims and challenges in successive courts, including the SC, packed with Trump appointees - these Democratic leaders have not faltered on ANY challenge to republicans in gaining overwhelming support from their membership in both bodies.

Whatever Truthout wants them to say will need to wait until they have Democratic votes in hand to back up their intentions. Both have said they're caucusing on these issues and more this week.

But, let's blame the prosecutors for the obstruction by the perps and their court enablers. And, by all means, let's blame the Dem leaders for the minority of members Democrats afforded them with in a binary system of elections in which the opposition is a fascist dictator leading a cult of corporatist simps. /s

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't know if they want to reveal everything in their toolbox right now, so to speak Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #1
Keeping one's powder dry. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #7
Seriously your comment is a bit reassuring vapor2 Yesterday #17
This is kinda the same argument many of us here on DU, including me, were making in regards to Merrick Garland, MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #18
I hear you, but Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #20
... orangecrush Yesterday #76
maybe we could try... ret5hd Yesterday #101
If a rogue militia gunning down American citizens with impunity is not the right time, what is? Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #102
1000% TIMES THIS. No more M.Garland-style hope. No more wishing Maru Kitteh Yesterday #27
Garland handed over a fast moving investigation to Smith who brought an indictment with more than enough time to convict bigtree Yesterday #48
Thank you! betsuni Yesterday #57
Hey there, posse pal! MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #71
Giddy-up, partner! betsuni Yesterday #77
Yippy kai yay! sheshe2 2 hrs ago #128
Ever see Die Hard? MorbidButterflyTat 1 hr ago #129
LOL.... sheshe2 1 hr ago #130
You're preaching to the choir MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #70
When it was discovered he had stolen all that classified material questionseverything Yesterday #81
This! A hundred times this!! CrispyQ Yesterday #87
He for sure wouldn't be walking around freely questionseverything Yesterday #88
anyone looking at how high profile prosecutions are challenged and appealed bigtree Yesterday #89
If he was sitting in jail, waiting for trial like any other traitor would be questionseverything Yesterday #90
that possibility just existed in the internet fantasy prosecution bigtree Yesterday #91
We disagree and I don't feel the need to belittle you and that's your entire argument questionseverything Yesterday #92
lol bigtree Yesterday #94
Yeah right. choie Yesterday #33
Respectfully, I understand the optimism angrychair Yesterday #41
I appreciate the response Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #42
No worries at all angrychair Yesterday #44
Thank you! Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #46
Seconding angrychair in my hopes that you improve hamsterjill Yesterday #68
Thank you so much! Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #84
This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush Yesterday #74
They need to meet this moment leftstreet Yesterday #2
Sadly, I think we need to face the fact that they won't. And our Democratic popularity will stay in the tank. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #105
Gosh I hope they don't listen. Everyone knows defund is a TERRIBLE slogan. Maybe something like "we want nicer ICE?" WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #3
Seen on social media: I like my ICE crushed. CrispyQ Yesterday #8
Saw the same meme the other day peggysue2 Yesterday #65
Defund is a third rail term Johonny Yesterday #4
How about " Keep the Border Sealed-- Re-form Ice" Ars Longa Yesterday #23
Build the case that ICE is wasting money, on jets for instance. dem4decades Yesterday #34
I didn't want to defund them angrychair Yesterday #47
Unlike Defund the Police, this is a movement/term I can 100% back. n/t Ms. Toad Yesterday #35
"There is nothing impossible to him who will try." Kid Berwyn Yesterday #5
They could write strict regulations into the bill Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #6
what bill? bigtree Yesterday #59
My comments were in the context of positions the leadership could take Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #82
the members of their respective bodies chose them bigtree Yesterday #93
"It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners." ― Albert Camus Ping Tung Yesterday #9
Wanting to neuter ICE is a political loser... biocube Yesterday #10
The only test they have to pass is a loyalty test. gab13by13 Yesterday #12
Yes they definitely need MORE money WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #14
Oh! So the ICE murderer just wasn't trained properly leftstreet Yesterday #19
Yes, I think if we had the same requirements for police officers biocube Yesterday #22
yeah we know cops never murder anybody WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #24
Nonsense leftstreet Yesterday #30
I don't see a lot of evidence pointing towards your assertion Torchlight Yesterday #21
More training for Proud Boys Brownshirts is not going to make a bit of difference SamuelTheThird Yesterday #31
Yeah that's what happened choie Yesterday #37
I have a question that I hope those with more knowledge on this can help explain Quiet Em Yesterday #11
Victims refuse JBTaurus83 Yesterday #13
At the very minimum, DISARM ICE C_U_L8R Yesterday #15
I recommend they never say ANYTHING aocommunalpunch Yesterday #16
Because complicity has been an effective response so far! Duncan Grant Yesterday #25
They should have a background check. No arrest Emile Yesterday #26
No wonder so many Dems are registering as independent now. CousinIT Yesterday #28
Something about beatings continuing until morale improves. n/t flvegan Yesterday #29
Schumer and Jeffries are legitimate, elected leaders. gulliver Yesterday #32
Wut? We can't call for the reining-in of ICE because we weren't elected? And we're trying to lose us the midterms Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #103
Both need to face a primary. This is being complicit in the torture and murder of US citizens as well as immigrants. Demsrule86 Yesterday #36
Schumer is not up until 28 SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #49
no Dem leader could undo the funding right now bigtree Yesterday #55
No matter how many times it's explained who votes for leadership, fact refuses to sink in. betsuni Yesterday #72
seriously. I have a hard time believing that they don't know the leaders represent the membership bigtree Yesterday #78
I know. Now I have the urge to use "refuse" in every sentence. betsuni Yesterday #83
THEY DON'T CONTROL THE BUDGET bigtree Yesterday #38
Again big thank you. betsuni Yesterday #64
you're welcome, going back to my plough, now bigtree Yesterday #66
Oh, look! Facts. Logic. Truth. (Thank you!) QueerDuck 5 hrs ago #121
Long worried about Schumer. Now worried about Jeffries. Nm Grins Yesterday #39
Defunding ICE maliaSmith Yesterday #40
While i agree something needs to be done Samael13 Yesterday #43
correct, I see less than half a dozen legislators in the article bigtree Yesterday #63
How large is too large BidenRocks Yesterday #45
Many Desirable Things Would be Possible if We Had a Democratic Majority in the House and Senate. MineralMan Yesterday #50
I would assume that both the SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #51
Our nation survived for 202 years without Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Thunderbeast Yesterday #52
ICE was only formed in late 2003 as a response to 9/11 and the Homeland Security Act. It's budget then was Nanjeanne Yesterday #53
Clickbait headline mcar Yesterday #54
"Little interest" - oh, that's so much better! I'm relieved. Thank God. (nt) Duncan Grant Yesterday #60
Better than refuse and the headline is misleading mcar Yesterday #62
Regardless, they are doing nothing more than make speeches. Duncan Grant Yesterday #67
"...impotent, cowardly acquiescence." MorbidButterflyTat 50 min ago #133
It's designed to feed the anger of those who promote that Democrats "do-nothing" and "know-nothing" or... QueerDuck 5 hrs ago #122
Yup mcar 2 hrs ago #125
Post removed Post removed 2 hrs ago #127
Truth...out. sheshe2 1 hr ago #131
Oh yeah mcar 57 min ago #132
I won't comment because I'd just get a post removed message CanonRay Yesterday #56
Close the border! Leave law abiding people alone! OrlandoDem2 Yesterday #58
Childish belief there are simple easy solutions for everything but mean old Democrats refuse to do them. betsuni Yesterday #61
Yeah orangecrush Yesterday #80
Childish belief the designated leaders do no wrong Mysterian Yesterday #100
Said nobody ever. betsuni 22 hrs ago #104
Do you actually believe you "debunked" anything with this post: Mysterian 6 hrs ago #111
You shall soon be implied to be a bad Democrat mr715 6 hrs ago #114
"Childish" mr715 6 hrs ago #113
I'd like to see new leadership. hamsterjill Yesterday #69
the members of the party elect their own leadership bigtree Yesterday #96
Well, it's time for a change in my opinion. hamsterjill Yesterday #98
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #73
Didn't we all just have this same argument last week? MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #75
this time it's conveniently while Dems are meeting this week to make these decisions bigtree Yesterday #97
It refuses to go away. We will see it again next week and the week after that and the week after that. betsuni 22 hrs ago #106
Makes me sick orangecrush Yesterday #79
When maga has run its course, there will be time enough at last to regroup. usonian Yesterday #85
This is war. They want to destroy us. I'm tired of nambie pambie pretending any of the is normal. flashman13 Yesterday #86
you don't even know their position on this, yay or nay bigtree Yesterday #95
Possibly you missed a reporter asking Jefferies straight up whether he supported de-funding ICE. flashman13 Yesterday #99
that's specious bigtree 21 hrs ago #108
No it's not. It's more weak kneed non leadership. flashman13 9 hrs ago #110
Leaders lead. mr715 6 hrs ago #112
they are leading. bigtree 6 hrs ago #116
The minority leader's function isn't really legislating mr715 6 hrs ago #118
'opposition messaging' is a canard in this case bigtree 5 hrs ago #119
As you know, the Senate leadership mr715 5 hrs ago #120
'defund' is a word that you likely won't see anywhere in any messaging from the leadership bigtree 5 hrs ago #123
Again, I appreciate this position mr715 5 hrs ago #124
""Statements and letters are not enough, and the appropriations process Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #107
They seem to be "re-fighting last year's election"---- Jack Valentino 21 hrs ago #109
Why? kentuck 6 hrs ago #115
that's nonsense bigtree 6 hrs ago #117
I look forward to seeing their replacements take over. nt Gore1FL 2 hrs ago #126
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schumer and Jeffries Refu...»Reply #48