Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockCreek

(1,434 posts)
29. Why aren't legal release orders for Immediate release?
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 01:50 AM
Jan 31

With the release being to the state of (for example) Minnesota? or a non- profit agency with people always available?
I know little of this part if the system, but why isn't, for example,
An order delivered with people assigned to take custody accompanying, and ready to go wherever necessary to get the person (within the judge's jurusdiction)? If the person no longer in state and ordered not to remove person from state, then the perpetrators are already in violation and need to be brought in front if the judge immediately and/or thrown in jail awaiting a hearing for their violations. No bail. Etc.
The people that would take custody can then arrange for a humane release not dumped on the streets thousands of miles from home.
And immediate means immediate. If not immediate the people involved are violation. The violation is not erased by release.
ICE etc whisk people around from state to state, and out of the country,so quickly that there are clearly no time consuming paperwork requirements that need to be followed before release.

The time given to enact judicial orders seems to be part of what ICE etc use to f--k around with the system. The court system needs to respond appropriately.

Eddited to ADD: the Jan 6th traitor were released pretty damn near immediately. The system must be made to respond as diligently and quickly to a judge's orders as to the president's.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And yet we still hear "But he won't do that. It's against the law!" Whyisthisstillclose Jan 30 #1
It's over Timewas Jan 30 #2
Yup. OldBaldy1701E Jan 30 #5
As it is with the international rule of law. PhylliPretzel Jan 30 #21
This is what Trump does D_Master81 Jan 30 #3
The Roy Cohn play book. BattleRow Jan 30 #6
We have to quit saying Trump popsdenver Jan 30 #7
Also serving himself. Justice matters. Jan 30 #11
Stephen Miller will not have the public support that Trump does JI7 Jan 30 #25
He doesn't have the public support now whopis01 Jan 31 #30
Trump is the President and he does have a lot of public support JI7 Jan 31 #31
Thats how he ran his businesss. Nt Callie1979 Jan 30 #17
Justice BidenRocks Jan 30 #4
Ta HELL with a choice... GiqueCee Jan 30 #12
When the people are barred from using legal, nonviolent methods of protest Orrex Jan 30 #8
JFK Lokee11 Jan 30 #24
What the fuck is he afraid of? choie Jan 30 #9
It's time to start listing republican-owned assets tonekat Jan 30 #10
I do NOT understand the system, BUT if we have lifetime judges deciding to fold and give up what can be done? bluestarone Jan 30 #13
IMO- President Obama's biggest mistake... Snackshack Jan 30 #14
And Biden believing that "there's an awful lot of really good Republicans out there" that he could work with progressoid Jan 30 #15
Biden was old school Democrat. Where the differences between parties was very minor. Really just financial. LiberalArkie Jan 30 #16
That judge halted the contempt BumRushDaShow Jan 30 #18
One problem is that you have to have a specific victim of an order for contempt to be a thing dsc Jan 30 #19
It's like my step-daughter and her son...... "David, stop doing that. 3Hotdogs Jan 30 #20
Or like some parents say to their misbehaving kids Seinan Sensei Jan 30 #26
None of the other cases was the SUBJECT of this action. They were just part of the evidence. pnwmom Jan 30 #22
I have seen this a couple times now angrychair Jan 30 #23
I don't think that's what either article meant. pnwmom Jan 30 #28
I Said the Same Thing Yesterday Roy Rolling Jan 30 #27
Why aren't legal release orders for Immediate release? RockCreek Jan 31 #29
They have been ignoring court orders in Illinois, too. mucifer Jan 31 #32
judging is hard. nt Javaman Jan 31 #33
FOLLOW THE MONEY !!!! usaf-vet Jan 31 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Minnesota Chief Judge Fol...»Reply #29