Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(294,119 posts)

8. If the VP's response to an execution is "for what",

Wed Feb 4, 2026, 04:34 PM

Wednesday

It is pellucidly clear that shame is not part of their make up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander C_U_L8R Wednesday #1

How could they file that lawsuit with a straight face?? BlueWaveNeverEnd Wednesday #2

If the VP's response to an execution is "for what", malaise Wednesday #8

Simple, they expected "their" SCROTUS appointees to do what FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #10

The same way they run interference for a child rapist and Russian asset peppertree Wednesday #12

Unlike the ReTHUG slop, the Democratic sauce was voted malaise Wednesday #7

GOP - hoisted by their own precedent Torchlight Wednesday #3

The reason this suceeded and others haven't is intheflow Wednesday #4

Who dissented? no_hypocrisy Wednesday #5

Gavin did it right obamanut2012 Wednesday #9

awww so sad. LOL nt Javaman Wednesday #14

But gives all the Red States carte blanche WarGamer Wednesday #16