Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ol Janx Spirit

(855 posts)
18. I agree. Impeachment--at this point in time--shouldn't even be considered for anything but the...
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 07:44 PM
Thursday

...most egregious thing imaginable--something so obviously horrible that members of the sitting president's own party are calling for it. Otherwise it is just a waste of time and political capital--more likely to be used against the party bringing it than against the perpetrator of the high crimes and misdemeanors.

Republicans are certainly not calling for anything in this case, and it seems too easy for them to brush this off as not even really being part of his duties as president--so nothing to see here. I can easily see them saying that when it comes to Turnip the standard is that only things directly related to the running of the country are fair game--not merely construction projects he might want to pursue. Of course, their standard would be jaywalking for a Democrat, but we expect that hypocrisy--it doesn't change the vote count.

All of the energy the Democratic party expends should be spent pursuing getting public sentiment on the side of undoing the damage that conservatives have done to our democracy over the last several decades--including, but not limited to:
- Getting corporate and dark money out of politics
- Restoring a robust education system in the U.S.
- Getting religion out of the public square
- Restoring balance to the Supreme Court
- Ensuring elections are actually free and fair
- Bringing more voters to the polls so democracy truly has a powerful voice
- Codifying the norms we all took for granted before the era of the Orange Abomination

Drawn out and futile impeachment debates do not further those goals IMO.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think that is one of the things that terrifies Trump about a Dem majority Fiendish Thingy Thursday #1
Impeachment is soooo last century. progressoid Thursday #2
I get the sentiment angrychair Thursday #4
The problem is, the inbred MAGA drones LOVE the grift and corruption. Aristus Thursday #16
You are soooooo right. Tried it twice before. What makes anyone think the Senate would convict this time? Katinfl Thursday #5
I agree. Impeachment--at this point in time--shouldn't even be considered for anything but the... Ol Janx Spirit Thursday #18
"[O]n the grounds of national security" means THE BUNKER. ColoringFool Thursday #3
Not necessarily. It is just a phrase that is supposed to close down discussions. erronis Thursday #8
Rec. Very good points Evolve Dammit Thursday #6
What? Another one?? Fil1957 Thursday #7
Impeachment?! paleotn Thursday #9
I'll go out on a limb and rec n/t BaronChocula Thursday #17
It was illegal. regardless of all that. GoCubsGo Thursday #10
"Tearing down half the White House disguises another of my bribery slush funds" struggle4progress Thursday #11
And this will make what difference? n/t TygrBright Thursday #12
"but we illegally destroyed the bunker we use for national security!" eggplant Thursday #13
"on the grounds of NATIONAL SECURITY?"... GiqueCee Thursday #14
"An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives...... Brother Buzz Thursday #15
Bombing Old Faithful in Yellowstone without Congressional approval would violate the Property Clause of the Constitution pat_k Friday #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Impeachable Offense J...»Reply #18