Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baitball Blogger

(52,009 posts)

7. The articles I have been reading this morning have made it sound like they only needed 51.

Reply to lamp_shade (Reply #3)

Sun Feb 15, 2026, 09:06 AM

Feb 15

So, I am relieved to hear this from you.

It really does sound like even reliable sources are trying to create urgency to get readers to read their articles. I'm thankful to have DU as a source.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, who is watching the progress of the Save Act in the Senate? [View all] Baitball Blogger Feb 15 OP

She's not the deciding vote newdeal2 Feb 15 #1

When will this nightmare end? Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #2

A new liberal SCOTUS being installed? newdeal2 Feb 15 #4

I hear that as written, JD Vance would not be able to vote because Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #10

60 votes will be needed to pass senate. lamp_shade Feb 15 #3

The articles I have been reading this morning have made it sound like they only needed 51. Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #7

FYI - lamp_shade Feb 15 #11

SAVE rso Feb 15 #5

It should be called the Save Republicans Act yourout Feb 15 #6

Good observation. Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #8

Save Republicans ASS Act. nt Trueblue Texan Feb 15 #9

Like the one above yours, BUT i even like yours BETTER!! bluestarone Feb 16 #13

Now apparently Thune is going to attach it to a "must-pass" bill not fooled Feb 16 #12

. Baitball Blogger Feb 16 #14

DOUBLE bluestarone Feb 16 #15