General Discussion

not fooled

(6,634 posts)

12. Now apparently Thune is going to attach it to a "must-pass" bill

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Mon Feb 16, 2026, 12:40 PM

Feb 16

Thom Hartmann just gave an update on his show, saying that instead of trying to pass it as a stand-alone bill which means Dems can filibuster it, pukes are now going to attach it to something else that "has" to pass to make it filibuster proof. Some/many puke female senators have come out in support.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, who is watching the progress of the Save Act in the Senate? [View all] Baitball Blogger Feb 15 OP

She's not the deciding vote newdeal2 Feb 15 #1

When will this nightmare end? Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #2

A new liberal SCOTUS being installed? newdeal2 Feb 15 #4

I hear that as written, JD Vance would not be able to vote because Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #10

60 votes will be needed to pass senate. lamp_shade Feb 15 #3

The articles I have been reading this morning have made it sound like they only needed 51. Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #7

FYI - lamp_shade Feb 15 #11

SAVE rso Feb 15 #5

It should be called the Save Republicans Act yourout Feb 15 #6

Good observation. Baitball Blogger Feb 15 #8

Save Republicans ASS Act. nt Trueblue Texan Feb 15 #9

Like the one above yours, BUT i even like yours BETTER!! bluestarone Feb 16 #13

Now apparently Thune is going to attach it to a "must-pass" bill not fooled Feb 16 #12

. Baitball Blogger Feb 16 #14

DOUBLE bluestarone Feb 16 #15