Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]JustAnotherGen
(37,877 posts)188. I make no bones about it
They are an existential threat to the Black and Latino children in my family.
MLK was great - but its time to move on from that. It failed. All of jt.
Just one Black Woman in America but I'm certain I'm not alone. They HATE US. They've Bern allowed to get away with it since 1877. I'm done.
I want their souls crushed when this Regime ends. We can make exceptions to freedom of speech which outlaw Nazi and Confederate symbolism. Europe is fighting back better because they learned from their past. If we don't learn and implement - we will be right back here in 80 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
248 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]
Scrivener7
Feb 17
OP
Sorry, it's not the Democratic Party. It's Republican voters, third party voters, and petulant nonvoters
lapucelle
Feb 17
#3
And maga-pub IS NOT a political party---- it is a criminal domestic terrorist organization
Jack Valentino
Feb 17
#207
I think we here all work hard to elect Democrats. And we have been doing so for years. And yet, here we are.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#48
Work harder to shut down opposition narratives, most especially those from purists and punishers
lapucelle
Feb 17
#52
To begin with, expressing an opinion on a topic is not "shutting down discussion" on a topic.
lapucelle
Feb 17
#66
Even given the definitional problems (and notwithstanding the random use of latin),
lapucelle
Feb 17
#127
Recognizing a Latin word and saying your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises is not an argument either
Ilikepurple
Feb 17
#198
Creating your own three term argument by merging two distinct and seperate terms into one
lapucelle
Wednesday
#221
You said even given the definitional problems, there conclusion does not follow
Ilikepurple
Wednesday
#236
You merged two terms into one in an attempt to create a syllogism where none exists.
lapucelle
Wednesday
#239
I'm really looking forward to the primaries too. We have an incredible bench, and
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#73
It's the Democratic Party which nominates candidates which voters either accept or reject
Jose Garcia
Feb 17
#154
Same here. And I'm highly suspect of the motives of anyone demanding we do otherwise.
FoxNewsSucks
Feb 17
#67
Yep. And that's the problem. This has nothing to do with criticizing Democrats. It has to do with looking at
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#8
I'm with you right up until the part about nominating a republican. But I get your point.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#22
If we don't look at the issues of the Dem structure, and question it, then we are in a cult...
yellow dahlia
Feb 17
#81
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever
Ping Tung
Feb 17
#11
"I am a Christian and a Democrat. That's all": FDR, when asked to define his political philosophy.
lapucelle
Feb 17
#21
Yes, folks choose to vote for Republicans or third-party candidates or to withhold any vote as punishment
lapucelle
Feb 17
#120
Just as there's nothing wrong calling out the politicians who support or vote for
Ping Tung
Feb 17
#143
I'm not talking about ripping on Dems and I'm not talking about anything that violates the TOS.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#13
Fire the strategists and consultant class, The party needs to stop making the same mistakes.
yellow dahlia
Feb 17
#86
Any time we stop speaking truth, we benefit those who want to hide the truth.
hamsterjill
Feb 17
#14
Cheerleaders, the party is always right, swarm, posse, toe the line, echo chamber, blind loyalty, marching in lockstep,
betsuni
Feb 17
#17
Finding out facts instead of leaping to negative conclusions about Democrats is mocked as mindless loyalty. Projection.
betsuni
Feb 17
#164
We failed to read history, but it's only now that history is understood at all
bucolic_frolic
Feb 17
#18
So much yes to this! All those bad movies about evil conglomerates trying to rule the world?
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#29
My daughter quipped the other day - "Who knew the original Superman movie was a road map..."
harumph
Feb 17
#42
Trump 2.0 could have been prevented by closing the border and having a normal primary
dalton99a
Feb 17
#31
I think that's a perfect example because it's my opinion that, if Democratic leaders had not gotten so much
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#44
So a groundswell of constituent opinion has no effect on your elected officials?
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#134
i completely agree with you. We should be able to speak freely if it is for constructive reason
samsingh
Feb 17
#51
So the lesson, which I hope we have learned, is that we release it all as soon as we are able.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#122
100% Agree, Scrivener 7. If we can't see our own part in something we can't improve...
johnnyplankton
Feb 17
#55
I do think the DNC is starting to realize that much of the grass roots is really pissed at the party leadership
Bluetus
Feb 17
#83
I think recent events have provided us with a pretty extensive list of things we
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#85
There was one in particular this morning that was a good example. I can't link to it. For reasons I will not state.
Scrivener7
Feb 17
#107
Milquetoast, strongly worded letters, old guard, status quo, gerontocracy, Vichy Dems, Surrender Dems,
betsuni
Feb 17
#124
Good post Scrivener7, and a worthwhile question to ask. I feel the biggest mistake we may have made is to underestimate
c-rational
Feb 17
#101
It's not possible currently to discuss mistakes and we are doomed to repeat them again.
Melon
Feb 17
#152
This and your gatekeeping is the issue that prevents open discussion and improvement.
Melon
Feb 17
#177
It has nothing to do with being loyal. It's about fighting back against (often) unfair and unwarranted criticism.
W_HAMILTON
Feb 17
#153
I wasn't defending Garland (especially towards the end) nor was I backstabbing Hillary and Kamala.
W_HAMILTON
Thursday
#241
I may be late to this discussion, but I read it early this morning and just now thought I would add my 2cents.
Ninga
Feb 17
#155
And they feel just as strongly as you do about their name calling being calling it as they see it
EdmondDantes_
Feb 17
#205
The key: 100% confidence one is 100% correct, obviously morally righteously correct.
betsuni
Wednesday
#212
The number of RECs, replies, and views to this OP shows just how important to the DU community...
Ol Janx Spirit
Feb 17
#197