Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(130,025 posts)

3. So an illegal application of a statute should continue because it would be too complicated

Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:41 PM

Friday

to fix the mess the illegal application caused in the first place?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not likely to restrict going forward?... lame54 Friday #2

Every crook has a new angle to plead in court bucolic_frolic Friday #5

Alcohol is another fat tariff that diminished trade bucolic_frolic Friday #4

"...going forward..." MoseShrute Friday #6

crying in his malt liquor. B.See Friday #7

Judge worries that crook can't pay back money he stole. Hugin Friday #9

It's a pathetic whine for a so-called judge to make muriel_volestrangler Friday #10

That's his "legal" argument? progressoid Friday #11

We should pay for Trump's illegal tariffs? yellowcanine Friday #12