Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,455 posts)
5. The Supreme Court didn't say tariffs, per se, were illegal.
Sat Feb 21, 2026, 03:52 PM
Saturday

It said that the president couldn't use the law on which he based them (IEEPA) to impose tariffs.

There are other ways for the president to legally impose tariffs, at least on a temporary basis. He chose not to use those laws because the easiest to justify only allows the tariffs to be in place for 150 days before requiring congressional approval. He didn't want to risk congress rejecting the tariffs, so he took a legal gamble and lost.

So - first - all he has done since the decision is talk. Talk is not illegal. If he does impose tariffs under a different law, he isn't necessarily breaking the law by doing so. He isn't even defying Supreme Court.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

;-{)..... Goonch Saturday #1
I'm wondering the same thing Greywing Saturday #2
The Supreme Court didn't say tariffs, per se, were illegal. Ms. Toad Saturday #5
I wouldn't advise him going anywhere near Europe! dickthegrouch Saturday #3
Rinse. Repeat. Marcuse Saturday #4
Depends on the statute of limitations, Bayard Saturday #6
I had the same thought. yellow dahlia Sunday #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question for DU's...»Reply #5