Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,405 posts)
15. Most would not use fentanyl or heroin if they could get oxycodone or hydromorphone as cheaply/easily, so not those
Mon Feb 23, 2026, 12:47 PM
14 hrs ago

There's also safer but still euphoric amphetamines than meth a lot of users would switch to if they were as available as meth. Dexedrine for example.

Which is to say there are some arguably valid harm-reduction strategies, with the billions currently used for interdiction to be re-focused instead on public health. So, heroin and fentanyl and methamphetamine specifically should probably not be "legal" but if similar, less dangerous analogs were, the vast majority would switch to the legal source, drastically cutting the market for the illegal and more dangerous forms.

There's also the argument for "freedom" generally, and the fact that since it's your own body, you should be able to imbibe what you want.

It'll never happen, though. We're lucky we even have methadone and buprenorphine as harm reduction (for now at least)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's happening in Mexic...»Reply #15