Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newdeal2

(5,167 posts)
6. I don't think it should be her, for this
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 04:32 PM
11 hrs ago

They were more defiant but Democrats in the house did not have their backs, so here we are. Why should they take further risk?

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have no idea why the hell kacekwl 12 hrs ago #1
She didnt want to goto jail Johonny 12 hrs ago #2
Going to jail Cirsium 12 hrs ago #3
I don't think it should be her, for this newdeal2 11 hrs ago #6
Somebody has to Cirsium 11 hrs ago #7
Regarding the Dems not backing her - If they opposed her appearance, then Repukes would have a basis on which 3Hotdogs 9 hrs ago #23
Oh stop it, she is almost 80 years old. She has given a life of public service and gotten shit on for it the whole time. FascismIsDeath 11 hrs ago #8
Don't be ridiculous Cirsium 11 hrs ago #10
For one thing radical noodle 10 hrs ago #14
No good option Cirsium 10 hrs ago #15
Sure, but the Clintons really have nothing to lose radical noodle 4 hrs ago #30
This JBTaurus83 6 hrs ago #28
You most certainly made it sound like she should've bit the bullet and went to jail for contempt. FascismIsDeath 10 hrs ago #16
Video of Comer, Jordan, and Biggs in closed door discussions. AZ8theist 10 hrs ago #18
Maybe Cirsium 10 hrs ago #19
Your first response @ 1:53, totally, sounded like Hillary was the one to take jail for the team! Lol MerryBlooms 9 hrs ago #22
I know Cirsium 6 hrs ago #25
Of course. They're hauling us handcuffed out at their pleasure MerryBlooms 6 hrs ago #27
Anyone remember the American hero Susan McDougal? LiberalArkie 9 hrs ago #24
Was this a deliberate distraction on Boebert 's part MustLoveBeagles 12 hrs ago #4
She's just dumb. mr715 11 hrs ago #5
There's that too MustLoveBeagles 11 hrs ago #11
Boebert's trying to get back into poli-junkie 11 hrs ago #9
You have to be very smart to outsmart Hillary. Next contestant, come on down. twodogsbarking 11 hrs ago #12
There's no one. Either smart enough or naive enough. calimary 10 hrs ago #17
An ethical Republican... GiqueCee 10 hrs ago #13
criingeworthy. yea. AllaN01Bear 10 hrs ago #20
so, laser breath messed up by violating the prior agreed to rule. typecal. AllaN01Bear 10 hrs ago #21
haha her expression Skittles 6 hrs ago #26
Concerning a post on this thread NoRethugFriends 6 hrs ago #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Hillary Clinton...»Reply #6