Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]LeftInTX
(34,180 posts)35. I had three kids:
1986: High Forceps (wish I would have given up and done the C-Sect. I think there was some mild brain damage. There were some decels and I was on O2. Son had really bad ADHD)
1990: All natural, except oral antibiotics for Group B vaginal strep.
1992: On oral antibiotics for the above again. Also on IV antibiotics for Group B strep during labor. (I was in the hospital for about two hours before I delivered) He broke my water just before I started pushing and did the episotmy afterward. (I knew he was gonna do this all in advance) I wanted all natural, but my doc with second delivery wasn't on my plan. No L&D complications.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
OP
Wow. That is appalling. The child is more important than the woman, no matter what.
Biophilic
Saturday
#2
What's extreme about this situation is forcing someone who's in active labor into a court hearing to establish legally
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
#5
People make medical decisions that result in their own deaths all the time.
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
#7
Exhibit A: all those Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions for themselves OR their children.
ShazzieB
Saturday
#39
Exactly what part of viable, at term, and in fetal distress do you not fucking understand?
paleotn
Saturday
#38
And? An obstetrics team is going to go to all that trouble unless it's for a good reason?
paleotn
Saturday
#57
The woman stated she had already had a life threatening complication from a C Section.
Hope22
Saturday
#61
Yes, I'm willing to sacrifice the lives of some full term fetuses to protect women's rights to bodily autonomy.
Crunchy Frog
Yesterday
#66
It was the woman's profession, but in her own case she was not making the safest decision
karynnj
Saturday
#44
If ONLY the decision was based on the health and welfare of the mother... the existing
slightlv
Saturday
#45
It's not as rare as people think, and it doesn't matter if someone thinks it's "safest".
Crunchy Frog
Yesterday
#65
It's not just Florida. In almost 30 states, hospitals can override the advance directives of pregnant people.
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
#14
Eh, men do give birth and it still is a thing, but likely because of the discrimination trans men face.
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
#13
Beyond appalling. Mother first, unless both can be saved & the mother's wishes unclear (& she is
hlthe2b
Saturday
#16
Women of reproductive age need to get the hell out of Florida. This is absurd.
Quiet Em
Saturday
#25
If it's an emergency C-Sect, fetal distress, certain maternal conditions, unknown fetal conditions etc.
LeftInTX
Saturday
#28
Glad I posted this thread. It's good to get a reminder about just how easily so many people are willing to sign away
WhiskeyGrinder
Saturday
#41
This is absolutely disgusting. Under no circumstances should women ever be robbed of the right to
Crunchy Frog
Yesterday
#64
Interesting to see how much anti-choice sentiment there really is here on DU. Article and the responses
Crunchy Frog
Yesterday
#69