Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Gaugamela

(3,494 posts)

3. Bernie, like most everyone here, understands the implications and societal costs of AI.

Reply to IA8IT (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 24, 2026, 12:34 PM

Yesterday

Of course the AI agent just mirrors Bernie Sanders’ perspective. That’s what makes this particular exchange ironic and humorous. Bernie is using the AI agent to express his own views while demonstrating how vacuous it is.

And personally, I don’t believe in “The Devil”. A bit 16th century, don’t you think?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie vs. Claude [View all] Quixote1818 Yesterday OP

Don't like a thing about this. Tells him what he wants to hear. An Infamous MAGA get same answers to same questions? IA8IT Yesterday #1

Bernie, like most everyone here, understands the implications and societal costs of AI. Gaugamela Yesterday #3

The Waterboy was released in 1998 IA8IT Yesterday #4

How would 2 people.... RussBLib Yesterday #5

Large Language Models are really non-deterministic (semi-random) number generators HesNotHere Yesterday #8

bernie is asking the right questions rampartd Yesterday #2

Thank you Bernie, for taking on this subject. AI is being pushed down our throats and Marie Marie Yesterday #6

I got more specific answers for some reason, and I think it's interesting. scipan Yesterday #7

LLMs are non-deterministic HesNotHere 23 hrs ago #9

I agree that it doesn't "know" anything, but it does alot more than just predicting the next token. scipan 23 hrs ago #10

No, it doesn't. HesNotHere 21 hrs ago #11

Number generator? Even parallel processors work in binary numbers, don't they? scipan 20 hrs ago #12

I disagree about its intent. scipan 20 hrs ago #13

Training is not programming. HesNotHere 19 hrs ago #14

It's a form of programming. Training is probably a better word. scipan 17 hrs ago #17

Training is not programming HesNotHere 16 hrs ago #20

BTW, if people can come to a real understanding of what is happening under the hood... HesNotHere 19 hrs ago #15

I know, it's scary nt scipan 17 hrs ago #18

Last thing....if you use your cellphone to ask ChatGPT what the solution is Fermi's Paradox... HesNotHere 19 hrs ago #16

Also no warp drive or Crucible scipan 17 hrs ago #19

I play with it and work with it too HesNotHere 16 hrs ago #21

Hell, give it an arm, and a goat, and maybe a few more updates. scipan 16 hrs ago #23

Side note, warp drive misses the point of the sad joke of the universe HesNotHere 16 hrs ago #22

Yeah it's not looking good. nt scipan 16 hrs ago #24