Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Chief Justice and His Wife Took $20 Million From Firms He Rules On. I'm Filing for His Disbarment Today [View all]
Over sixteen years of federal financial disclosure forms, Chief Justice John Roberts mischaracterized more than twenty million dollars in household income from law firms appearing before the Supreme Court. He concealed his wifes equity stake in her employer for three consecutive years. He failed to recuse from more than five hundred cases argued at the Supreme Court by law firms that had paid his household millions in commissions. He architected the Courts first ethics code and designed it to be unenforceable. This is a course of conduct stretching across two decades, connected by a single through-line: the belief that the rules that apply to every other federal judge do not apply to him.
The governing standard is 28 U.S.C. § 455, which applies to every federal judge including Supreme Court justices. Three of its subsections matter here, and a judge only needs one of them to trigger the recusal obligation. Roberts triggers all three.
Subsection (a) says a judge shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. This is the appearance standard, and it does not require actual bias. It requires only that a reasonable person knowing the facts would question the judges impartiality.
Thats the lowest bar, and its the easiest to satisfy. The next two are more specific and even more difficult to evade.
https://cmarmitage.substack.com/p/the-chief-justice-and-his-wife-tookThe governing standard is 28 U.S.C. § 455, which applies to every federal judge including Supreme Court justices. Three of its subsections matter here, and a judge only needs one of them to trigger the recusal obligation. Roberts triggers all three.
Subsection (a) says a judge shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. This is the appearance standard, and it does not require actual bias. It requires only that a reasonable person knowing the facts would question the judges impartiality.
Thats the lowest bar, and its the easiest to satisfy. The next two are more specific and even more difficult to evade.
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Chief Justice and His Wife Took $20 Million From Firms He Rules On. I'm Filing for His Disbarment Today [View all]
pnwmom
Apr 24
OP
Our society has been leaning in this direction for as long as I have been paying attention.
Baitball Blogger
Apr 24
#21
And we are told "No one is above the LAW". wink, wink, chuckle, chuckle, ha, ha
republianmushroom
Apr 24
#24