Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(4,079 posts)
8. How it can backfire
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 01:03 PM
Apr 29

Maximizing the number of districts that lean Republican causes the margins in those districts to shrink. it trades a few very safe districts for a larger number of moderately safe ones. That tradeoff is where the risk comes in. Gerrymandering doesn’t simply make every district close—it actually trades a few very safe districts for a larger number of somewhat safe ones. That trade is what creates both the advantage and the risk.

Imagine a state with more voters from one party than the other—say 60 blue voters and 40 red voters, divided into five districts. If the districts are drawn fairly, the blue party might win three districts and the red party might win two, with each district having a comfortable margin. In that situation, most races are not especially close, so small changes in voter preferences don’t change the outcome very much.

Now consider what happens if the lines are drawn to favor the red party. The blue voters might be “packed” into one district where they win overwhelmingly, while the remaining voters are spread across the other four districts so that red wins each of them. This produces a better outcome for red—four seats instead of three—but the margins in those four districts are no longer as large as before. Instead of winning comfortably, red is now winning several districts by more modest margins.

That’s where the risk comes in. Because the voters have been spread more thinly, a small shift in opinion—just a few voters in each district—can flip multiple seats at once. In the fair map, those same small shifts might not be enough to change any outcomes, because the margins are larger. In the gerrymandered map, however, the advantage depends on maintaining several narrower leads, and those leads are easier to lose.

A simple way to put it is that gerrymandering turns a few very safe wins into a larger number of less secure ones. It can increase the number of seats a party wins, but it also makes those wins more vulnerable. That’s why a relatively small statewide swing can sometimes cause a dramatic reversal when districts have been drawn this way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Curbs Use o...»Reply #8